ISA’s

The only way I can see someone on minimum wage having £3 million come retirement is if they live with their parents, don’t pay for their food and wear the same clothes all year, obviously having their mother was them and walk to work.
 
Chippie said:
The only way I can see someone on minimum wage having £3 million come retirement is if they live with their parents, don’t pay for their food and wear the same clothes all year, obviously having their mother was them and walk to work.

As others may or may not, I have a spreadsheet that shows every monthly wage I have earned, since I was 14 years old. From age 19, I was fully employed in decent Jobs. The grand total when I retired last year, gross, before any tax, NI, pen con, let alone living expenses. Is just over £1m. No real point to mentioning that, other than you can't simply put it under a rock for old age or it's worthless when you get there. :wink:
 
Scubaregs said:
The simple fact is, money makes money.
If you have spare cash to invest over the piste you will get returns.
The problem is, many don't. Most people on low incomes simply can't afford to save anything each month, they need all of their take home pay simply to live.
For those with a salary that allows spare cash to invest it is a balance between that and a higher standard of living. Yes you can live frugally and invest for your retirement, there is no guarantee though you will reach it though.
As I said, it's a balance and we each make our choices.
However to suggest anyone on minimum wage could have 3 million in the bank come retirement if they really wanted to is beyond stupidity. It is patronising in the extreme, shows an utter lack of empathy and quite frankly makes the person spouting it look like an utter cockwomble.

IMO of course.
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.
 
Nanu said:
Scubaregs said:
The simple fact is, money makes money.
If you have spare cash to invest over the piste you will get returns.
The problem is, many don't. Most people on low incomes simply can't afford to save anything each month, they need all of their take home pay simply to live.
For those with a salary that allows spare cash to invest it is a balance between that and a higher standard of living. Yes you can live frugally and invest for your retirement, there is no guarantee though you will reach it though.
As I said, it's a balance and we each make our choices.
However to suggest anyone on minimum wage could have 3 million in the bank come retirement if they really wanted to is beyond stupidity. It is patronising in the extreme, shows an utter lack of empathy and quite frankly makes the person spouting it look like an utter cockwomble.

IMO of course.
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.

My best mates father was a dentist, planned to retire at 40 and travel the world with his wife. Massive heart attack at 39.

Nothing is promised.
 
Nanu said:
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.

I agree - makes no sense to be the richest corpse in the graveyard!
 
ronk said:
Nanu said:
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.

I agree - makes no sense to be the richest corpse in the graveyard!
My wife is making sure that will never happen
 
Nanu said:
ronk said:
Nanu said:
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.

I agree - makes no sense to be the richest corpse in the graveyard!
My wife is making sure that will never happen

So is mine - but I’m doing what I can to help !
 
Nanu said:
Scubaregs said:
The simple fact is, money makes money.
If you have spare cash to invest over the piste you will get returns.
The problem is, many don't. Most people on low incomes simply can't afford to save anything each month, they need all of their take home pay simply to live.
For those with a salary that allows spare cash to invest it is a balance between that and a higher standard of living. Yes you can live frugally and invest for your retirement, there is no guarantee though you will reach it though.
As I said, it's a balance and we each make our choices.
However to suggest anyone on minimum wage could have 3 million in the bank come retirement if they really wanted to is beyond stupidity. It is patronising in the extreme, shows an utter lack of empathy and quite frankly makes the person spouting it look like an utter cockwomble.

IMO of course.
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.
100% true. Grand Farther, Farther, Farther in law, Mother in law none made it to retirement and sadly I doubt our son will either. Best thing I ever did planning for early retirement from a young age and happily still here to enjoy it. :thumbsup: You need a little disposable income to get rolling though, so folk on minimum wage realy are on a loser unless they find another income stream and certainly, you can't just save up for retirement or every one would retire early and the economy would fall apart. It just don't work like that.
 
ronk said:
Nanu said:
First problem in all this is you have to reach retirement age first then be fit and healthy enough to enjoy life after that.

I agree - makes no sense to be the richest corpse in the graveyard!

I fully agree also which is why I don't have a LISA.

Seems like a lot of people are oblivious to the 50-30-20 rule.

50% - essentials (needed to survive)
30% - luxuries (enjoying life)
20% - savings/investments (break glass when needed)

You will find people in Asia and Africa that earn $200 per month yet smile more than those in the West earning 10+ times more. The happiest moment in my life cost me nothing. If you think you need to spend money to enjoy life then you will never be happy. Money brings a sense of security and affords you flexibility and opens up more opportunity. The number one opportunity you can give to anyone is the best education that you can afford. A lot are lacking in financial education as been proven by the posts in here.

Hard times create hard men. Hard men create wealth. Wealth (good times) creates weak men. Weak men create hard times. The cycle then repeats. Breaking the cycle and instilling a hard work ethic for all future generations (making more good decisions than bad) is the key to long term happiness and success.

If you think I just simply save all my money then I refer you to the above 50-30-20 rule. It's also the reason why I don't have a LISA. A LISA can only be redeemed without a 25% penalty after the age of 60. I have however created one for my wife as a safety net because without me our savings wouldn't grow by even a fraction of what they do now so the 25% bonus will help her in the long run. I can enjoy these rewards whenever I want without any tax being paid or any early withdrawal penalties.

Oh and another update on my 22/23 ISA - since this is an ISA thread
 

Attachments

  • iWeb 6.png
    iWeb 6.png
    44.2 KB · Views: 296
You’ll have to remind us all what you do to earn your corn every month and to have sufficient income to allow a 50/30/ 20 distribution.

I suspect there are many who aren’t in such an enviable position.
 
SonnyA85 said:
It's also the reason why I don't have a LISA. A LISA can only be redeemed without a 25% penalty after the age of 60. I have however created one for my wife as a safety net because without me our savings wouldn't grow by even a fraction of what they do now so the 25% bonus will help her in the long run. I can enjoy these rewards whenever I want without any tax being paid or any early withdrawal penalties.

You pretty much give them back the 25% they give you if you take it out early (I think it worked out when I did the calculations a little bit more).

Which I guess makes it just about even if you had put the money in your regular ISA and not got the 25% on it?

Hopefully if you work a bit harder you can put yourself in the situation where you will be able to fire 4k into an LISA a year and not have to take it out. You can then forget about it and get the 25% each year on top of what ever stocks/etf's you buy.
 
For many people especially those on minimum wage 50% doesn't cover essentials and they don't have 30% to spend on luxuries and another 20% on savings.

For most of my working life I have been lucky and not had to take a job on minimum wages. That said at least 40% of my wages and sometimes 50% have been taken in off takes in one form or another. Add to that 12% pension contributions which were compulsory and whilst not leaving me in poverty, didn't leave much for luxuries. It was often a struggle to save and if the pension contributions had not been compulsory, I may have dropped them. It's only now due to my private index linked pensions that I can enjoy life.

Not everyone is as fortunate.
 
ronk said:
You’ll have to remind us all what you do to earn your corn every month and to have sufficient income to allow a 50/30/ 20 distribution.

I suspect there are many who aren’t in such an enviable position.
Exactly Ron.
Our 'financial wizard' is making the classic error of preaching to others, purely based on his own individual circumstances and presuming everyone is in the same position.
There are 40 odd million adults in this Country, and 40 million different personal circumstances.
I, for one, have been self-employed for 35 years and rarely know how much I will make from one month to the next. This 50/30/20 bollox could never work for me or millions of others.
 
mgrlane said:
SonnyA85 said:
It's also the reason why I don't have a LISA. A LISA can only be redeemed without a 25% penalty after the age of 60. I have however created one for my wife as a safety net because without me our savings wouldn't grow by even a fraction of what they do now so the 25% bonus will help her in the long run. I can enjoy these rewards whenever I want without any tax being paid or any early withdrawal penalties.

You pretty much give them back the 25% they give you if you take it out early (I think it worked out when I did the calculations a little bit more).

Which I guess makes it just about even if you had put the money in your regular ISA and not got the 25% on it?

Hopefully if you work a bit harder you can put yourself in the situation where you will be able to fire 4k into an LISA a year and not have to take it out. You can then forget about it and get the 25% each year on top of what ever stocks/etf's you buy.

You can't open more than 1 S&S ISA in a year (in your own name) and although the LISA broker does support the stocks I buy their charges are more than the platform I use therefore I would be making less on the rest. Therefore I would actually end up losing money by investing into a LISA vs what I am doing now. iWeb has zero annual fess. Nothing. You pay £100 to open the account and then it's free to use and you just pay for every buy and sell transaction (which is the same as everywhere else apart from they also charge you an annual fee). If I was to do what you are suggesting I would actually lose circa £400 this year in annual fees initially but soon as that grows I would be losing £1K per year in fees due to the total ISA balance. Therefore it makes absolutely zero sense for me to put money into a LISA as I lose the top up in fees gaining nothing and tying up my money for no reason.
 
Pondrew said:
ronk said:
You’ll have to remind us all what you do to earn your corn every month and to have sufficient income to allow a 50/30/ 20 distribution.

I suspect there are many who aren’t in such an enviable position.
Exactly Ron.
Our 'financial wizard' is making the classic error of preaching to others, purely based on his own individual circumstances and presuming everyone is in the same position.
There are 40 odd million adults in this Country, and 40 million different personal circumstances.
I, for one, have been self-employed for 35 years and rarely know how much I will make from one month to the next. This 50/30/20 bollox could never work for me or millions of others.

I know of several folk who are struggling to support themselves and who are spending 100% of their income to support themselves - blundering on from week to week and month to month. Robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Not an enviable position to be in.
 
Back
Top Bottom