Taz x said:aluminium trim on an M?
Taz x said:aluminium trim on an M?
dgm said:Taz x said:aluminium trim on an M?
And your point is? :lol:
Exclusive option on an M, very rare and desireable.
Taz x said:dgm said:Taz x said:aluminium trim on an M?
And your point is? :lol:
Exclusive option on an M, very rare and desireable.
ok hehe, my point is i don't like it
moonigan said:Is this because there is no demand at the moment for these cars or is it because the prices are artificially high![]()
Just like some speculate the Z4M will be a future classic, you speculate it won't.IK. said:There is no way Z4M prices will end up as the same as Z3M prices. Is the Z3M not a LOT rarer? This has a huge impact on the price it'll settle at; again coming back to your theory on supply and demand. There will be more supply than demand when compared to the Z3M. The Z4M, whilst great, will not be as iconic; and only a fool would base his assumptions on future values on this.
I also think the lack of demand has little to do with the shape of the car (i.e. Sports Car), but that it is hugely expensive to run when comparing it to even the 3.0si - which let's face it, isn't a lot slower or different to look at. In essence they are fairly commoditised to the majority of buyers. Which one will they choose when the 3.0si is massively cheaper to run than the M. Even when compared to running a Ford Focus, the 3.0si fairs extremely well.
What I don't understand is sellers pricing themselves out of a sale. Price it sensibly, and it will sell (or be prepared to wait for someone who is most likely more local). Price it not according to what you feel the car is worth, but what the market indicates. The same M cars have been sat on AutoTrader for weeks/months now, because they are ridiculously priced for the market.
I think you should do a bit more homework before labelling people as fools....There is no way Z4M prices will end up as the same as Z3M prices. Is the Z3M not a LOT rarer? The Z4M, whilst great, will not be as iconic; and only a fool would base his assumptions on future values on this.
one will they choose when the 3.0si is massively cheaper to run than the M. Even when compared to running a Ford Focus, the 3.0si fairs extremely well.
mikedav said:I think you should do a bit more homework before labelling people as fools....There is no way Z4M prices will end up as the same as Z3M prices. Is the Z3M not a LOT rarer? The Z4M, whilst great, will not be as iconic; and only a fool would base his assumptions on future values on this.
There were 165 RHD S54 equipped Z3Ms, and they were only built in 2002. There were about 300 of the S52 variant built between 1999 and 2001. Z4MC production for the UK was 588. The Z4M is already considered a future classic by various sources - Evo Magazine for example, though their write up is a mess! - and represents one of the last of the 'back to basics' , NA, manual M cars.
one will they choose when the 3.0si is massively cheaper to run than the M. Even when compared to running a Ford Focus, the 3.0si fairs extremely well.
The M costs more to run but having driven both, its more car. The costs are tiny compared to some cars - it's all relative. Besides, nobody buys a ten year old 'normal' Z3 Coupe 3.0 over a Z3M Coupe due to 'running costs'.
Zed_Steve said:Only 72 S54 Z3M Roadsters are left accounted for in the UK i believe. I sooo wanted one in imola red, but they are about as rare as hens teeth!
ZermattV said:Zed_Steve said:Only 72 S54 Z3M Roadsters are left accounted for in the UK i believe. I sooo wanted one in imola red, but they are about as rare as hens teeth!
What like this one .....
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2457990.htm
: