Interesting. On one side of the discussion the civilian point of view: Hero. Put his life on the line for his country. Wouldn't want to trust his life to his colleagues.
On the other side military points of view. Not claiming to be heros. Have put their lives on the line for their country. Would not want to depend on someone, in peace or war, who blatantly disregarded the rules that bind their Lives together and could potentiaLly put their lives at risk.
If military/ex military have a harder point of view consider this. Ignore the gun. Someone was sharing a living space with a large amount of potentially dangerous ammunition.
On the other side military points of view. Not claiming to be heros. Have put their lives on the line for their country. Would not want to depend on someone, in peace or war, who blatantly disregarded the rules that bind their Lives together and could potentiaLly put their lives at risk.
If military/ex military have a harder point of view consider this. Ignore the gun. Someone was sharing a living space with a large amount of potentially dangerous ammunition.