But its not 35isdrive, its SDrive35is and SDrive35iAndyJ said:The most confusing models to me initially were the 35i / 35is, especailly as sDrive is then tagged on the end. So you get a 35i sdrive and a 35is sDrive. However it doesn't take too long before you have adverts in AutoTrader that confuse the two, "35isDrive"… I know they didn't want to call it an M, but they could have made the designation difference clearer.
Angie4m said:Considering when the E89 was launched BMW promised that it would only be the 6 cylinder versions that would be avalible. Fast forward 4 years and they remove 1 6 cylinder engine and replace it with 3 2.0l 4 cylinder versions. To then add diesel to it would make them a right laughing stock.
Good to keep in mind that BMW built the E89 around it being a 'sports car' and diessl doesn't quite fit in with that look. Also the competition sell more diesel versions to company car drivers and even then both petrol and diesel variants aren't that popular these days. People want practical cars, however I find mines most practical for my needs.
mr wilks said:My thought for today on the E89 is why no turbo diesel is offered when the 2 rival companies offer them & every other model in BMW range also has TD engines available :?
AndyJ said:mr wilks said:My thought for today on the E89 is why no turbo diesel is offered when the 2 rival companies offer them & every other model in BMW range also has TD engines available :?
One of the reasons still to buy a BMW. Do you really fancy putting the roof down to listen to a DIESEL engine ?![]()
Anyone buying such a monstrosity has no car knowledge / passion.
sars said:That's a bit of a sweeping statement, I am a petrol head and a mechanical engineer. My 3.0 litre twin turbo diesel V6 sounds better than any 4 cylinder petrol engine and has a deeper rumble than any inline 6 petrol either![]()
AndyJ said:mr wilks said:My thought for today on the E89 is why no turbo diesel is offered when the 2 rival companies offer them & every other model in BMW range also has TD engines available :?
One of the reasons still to buy a BMW. Do you really fancy putting the roof down to listen to a DIESEL engine ?![]()
Anyone buying such a monstrosity has no car knowledge / passion.
AndyJ said:sars said:That's a bit of a sweeping statement, I am a petrol head and a mechanical engineer. My 3.0 litre twin turbo diesel V6 sounds better than any 4 cylinder petrol engine and has a deeper rumble than any inline 6 petrol either![]()
Sorry, but when you put your roof down, start the car up, you instantly must get out thinking your taxi has arrived.![]()
dr_john said:This isn't a E89 issue, BMW have been vague with their names for ages.
When I was looking at 3 series I found the 316, 318 and 320 all had 2 litre engines. Then the 328 came along, with a 2 litre engine.![]()
Machine monkey said:Also you do know that on new BMW cars well the hot ones with the M engineering and not just the badge. They make the sound come through the speakers???
Machine monkey said:Do you know what Andy I really was not baiting you. And the last thing i want is to get into a forum argument with you..
I didn't like your comment about the diesel. Or your comments made towards Sars. I should have kept quite. But i found what you said to be quite rude. End of as far as i am concerned i have said what i want. Of course you can carry on as much as you want... But i am out.
mr wilks said:Have you been at the tobacco tabs again Mat![]()
AndyJ said:If I offended Sars I appologise. My comment was never meant to offend anyone.
sars said:Oh and while we are on the subject of narrow mindedness, what is it with some people moaning about Turbo's, fabulous things. Yes I would rather have a 6 cylinder than a four pot turbo, but love my a V6 Turbo. These modern multi-turbo engines have reduced lag to an unnoticeable amount, just have a look at the Chris Harris review of either the new AMG GT or C63, I mean what's not to like :idunno: