G-A-R-Y said:
Spoke to the dealer, I checked the spec with the chassis number (LS83382) and it has a few more extras than he has listed. The tyres have been replaced with non run flats (Firestones) and the milage is 60335, which sounds about right. four previous owners. Is it worth a trip to London??
I suppose only you can answer if its worth the trip, are you far from London? I have traveled all over the country for the right car over the years, but it is a gamble, driving hundreds of miles for a shed is never nice!
Looking at the vin checker, you are right to say there are a few more extras than listed in the advert and more than your 2.5 would have had as standard, however most with the exception of the chromeline trim, xenons and wind deflector were standard on 3.0, so as 3.0 go its a low spec car in that regard, not that thats necessarily a bad thing. It depends whats important to you, the car itself may well be a great little car just a little light on toys, but you may never use some things if they were fitted anyway
One plus point is the the vin checker reveals its build date to be 08/04 which should mean all the wiring is in place for certain upgrades such as cruise and heated seats, making upgrading to these a doddle it you so wished.
Good saving on tyres if you intend to stick with 17" like you say you do and move to runflats, but only if they are in good nick, remember two were advisories on the last MOT, have they been replaced since? 4 previous owners on an 11 year old zed is nothing to worry about, some would say thats quite low.
Personally if it were me i would go and have a look