Channel 4 Tonight - The Plane Crash

kevinmarkwhite said:
Carol M said:
Nooooo, not watching, going on holiday tomorrow! :o

HOW!!!!!

You went on holiday just before you got your replacement Z4 (err...like I did!).

Where to?

Just be glad of the peace, don't ask questions :D
 
G14RRV said:
hahaha

my mum and dad are going to Barbados in 2 weeks, just sent my mum a text reminding her its on :driving:

they fly first class aswell ( 2nd most dangerous seats after the captain ) :fuelfire:

They would be better off using coach. Then use the thousands saved to hire a Bentley Continental for a week or buy a few ounces of Gold.
 
Frightening how it just broke apart at the front, the landing/crash didn't look that heavy :cry:
 
Stark said:
Great programme. Redundant plane still costs £300K!!

Yupp. All the systems are recoverable and go for very good money. A 747 windshield segment is well into five figures. There's a company at Kemble making a good living scrapping old airliners. Quite sad to see the planes making their last flight in
 
Does this mean I can get a seat at the front on Easy Air now, with some decent leg room and without having to quue like a sheep at a dip.
 
Was it me or did they over extend out a programme that contained information around common sense to 1.5 hrs? (sit at the impact end = die, hurt your leg = find it tricky to get out, brace position = works, non brace = doesnt, etc)
 
Carol M said:
Nooooo, not watching, going on holiday tomorrow! :o

Exactly the same thing went through my mind too, just replace 'tomorrow' with 'next week'. I'd rather be blissfully ignorant on this one than aware of the facts.
 
inkey$ said:
Was it me or did they over extend out a programme that contained information around common sense to 1.5 hrs? (sit at the impact end = die, hurt your leg = find it tricky to get out, brace position = works, non brace = doesnt, etc)

Perhaps, but the whole point of the experiment was to actually prove those things.

Regarding where to sit...each crash is different and they had one guy who survived a crash sat in row 1 whereas the rear of the plane broke up, so my attitude is that if its going to crash, your probably mullered, and lets face it...its out of your control how the aircraft breaks up. If you get the opportunity to escape, then thats a bonus.

Which is why, money permitting (or in my case, credit!) I'd rather by lieing down on my first class bed quoffing champagne!!!

They said the rear wheels snapped off as designed, but the front isn't designed to...so where asking if that could be why the front broke up. Sadly more experiments like this dont get done, so some things are just not known.
 
kevinmarkwhite said:
inkey$ said:
Was it me or did they over extend out a programme that contained information around common sense to 1.5 hrs? (sit at the impact end = die, hurt your leg = find it tricky to get out, brace position = works, non brace = doesnt, etc)

Perhaps, but the whole point of the experiment was to actually prove those things.

Regarding where to sit...each crash is different and they had one guy who survived a crash sat in row 1 whereas the rear of the plane broke up, so my attitude is that if its going to crash, your probably mullered, and lets face it...its out of your control how the aircraft breaks up. If you get the opportunity to escape, then thats a bonus.

Which is why, money permitting (or in my case, credit!) I'd rather by lieing down on my first class bed quoffing champagne!!!

They said the rear wheels snapped off as designed, but the front isn't designed to...so where asking if that could be why the front broke up. Sadly more experiments like this dont get done, so some things are just not known.

Understand all of that. Was sure they used computer models to do this in previous years though. Don't actually see the benefit of using a real plane other than to make a programme people will watch for an hour and a half about a plane crashing. There's probably an argument somewhere that says there's no second best to the real, physical world and that that's also why they crash test cars etc etc etc but I just question the entertainment vs real life research that came out of the programme, that's all. Yes the front wheel could be made to snap off but surely that's just logic (strong, non forgiving piece of metal digs into strong non forgiving piece of ground at speed = buckle, twist and breaking). Oh well, it kept me occupied for a while I suppose and was far better entertainment than anything on ITV2 :D
 
Carol M said:
pvr said:
Just be glad of the peace, don't ask questions :D

Shurrup and go polish your clogs. You'll miss me, just stop fighting it and admit it. :P

Two women going to Egypt? Why ... You are rated second class there as a woman and most likely ignored by any waiter etc ... Does not sound like fun to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom