Bubbling paint on bonnet

How did we end up here from bubbles on the bonnet.Let’s all calm down and take a deep breath before posting.
 
flybobbie said:
Easy to see aluminium construction, has a lot more folds to produce stiffness.
bonnet.jpg
Well found! As I've said, I didn't know the Z4 bonnet was aluminium. Now I do, this photo makes me feel better about it.

My experience of aluminium was a Jaguar XJ8. A glorious, rumbling, responsive 4.2 litre V8, sadly in a steel, aluminium and plastic body, where stiffness had been sacrificed for lightness. The roof was so thin you could dent it with one finger, the doors so light they felt like thin plywood (albeit extremely well fitted plywood) and the open bonnet wobbled so much you could close it and miss one of its two catches.

Worse still, Jaguar never really overcame the problem of galvanic corrosion.

So, I wasn't wildly excited to learn of the use of aluminium in the Z4 and will be interested to hear the outcome of robrooster5's dealings with BMW about his apparently corroded bonnet.

(Since reading his original post, I've been over my 72k-mile 35iS with a fine-tooth comb and, including the stone chips I've already mentioned, there's no evidence of corrosion, galvanic or otherwise. And the aluminium roof panels, front side panels and bonnet are, thank goodness, really stiff.)
 
Pbondar said:
I think you’ll find steel is about 3 times stiffer than aluminium..aka Young’s modulus ..

I'm sure Mr Google is your best friend! But have you any actual industry experience I wonder...?

Regarding stiffness and flow of aluminium alloy, what is your opinion on the best way to design the press tooling for vehicle panelwork, if the panel is to be alloy rather than steel?

You're obviously an authority, I'd be interested in your insight.
 
I remember seeing a documentary of early aluminium pressing. They were having real problems with tearing. That was 30 years ago.
 
flybobbie said:
I remember seeing a documentary of early aluminium pressing. They were having real problems with tearing. That was 30 years ago.

That's correct. The "perception" seems to be that alloy is very soft and therefore "flexible", when the opposite is true. Even today, it needs skilled design and very skilled "setting up" of the press tooling to successfully pop out alloy panels if they have a deep draw anywhere on the panel. As you said, tearing and cracking is common due to the low flexibility and elasticity of the metal.
 
Been to BMW today, They measured paint and Reads 117 Micron, they are saying this has been resprayed and it should be around 80? Looked online and it seems like anything over 170 is a respray? What do people think to this?
 
Trying to duck the issue if that info is correct, get an independent inspection and report from an automotive engineer and if that states no respray then go back to BMW and fight your case.
 
robrooster5 said:
Been to BMW today, They measured paint and Reads 117 Micron, they are saying this has been resprayed and it should be around 80? Looked online and it seems like anything over 170 is a respray? What do people think to this?

Someone has already said your pics show evidence of a da sander being used, that means it’s been resprayed :?
Rob
 
I also noticed it has done it slightly on the roof of the car in one place but this has no swirl marks..?? + on the bonnet, its all over not just one place and do not have the marks, this may be down to the light when taking the photo, im not sure?
 
I’ve read it’s circ 120 microns so I’d get a second opinion post lockdown, is there another dealership near you?
 
Smartbear said:
robrooster5 said:
Been to BMW today, They measured paint and Reads 117 Micron, they are saying this has been resprayed and it should be around 80? Looked online and it seems like anything over 170 is a respray? What do people think to this?

Someone has already said your pics show evidence of a da sander being used, that means it’s been resprayed :?
Rob

Could be just an amateur using a DA to detail Rob, they’re not to be used with no experience, very easy to overcook it with one. Beedub wouldn’t let me do my own car with one unless he was standing watching when I was at his place.
 
robrooster5 said:
Been to BMW today, They measured paint and Reads 117 Micron, they are saying this has been resprayed and it should be around 80? Looked online and it seems like anything over 170 is a respray? What do people think to this?

Beedubs your man Rob, pop him a PM, he knows the thickness of paint they should be, i ‘think’ Pastry is correct too from memory. :thumbsup:
 
As John said,
It could just be a poor da polisher bit of DIY detailing gone wrong,or a Rotary,as they are even easier to make a mess of paint with than a da polisher.
 
file.jpg


As I said earlier, you can see the swirls marks from a DA sander, not from a polisher, a sander. The marks are under the paint.

The panel has definitely been resprayed, no ifs or buts.

Might not be what you wanted to hear, but there it is.
 
Gasing a reaction to the paint underneath or from being wiped over by thinners to wipe off the dust.
I have used acrylic on acrylic and still had reaction. Perhaps acrylic on water based paints.
Seeing as in a line might some kind of run back from lifting the bonnet before respray. Might just be water contamination.
Take the car to a paint sprayer rather than BMW.
 
Back
Top Bottom