Best time to buy?

It looks as though the inspection 2 is correct although I'm yet to see the booklet in person. Taking this into consideration means it would have had a brake fluid change at this time.
 
Ninarvana said:
It looks as though the inspection 2 is correct although I'm yet to see the booklet in person. Taking this into consideration means it would have had a brake fluid change at this time.
I thought you just wanted to save a few hundred quid by buying at the right time! And break fluid has nothing to do with mileage, it's every two years. So in fact, you could easily have a inspection 2 without brake fluid if it didn't coincide. Brake fluid change is only about 50 quid at a main dealer any way. Would you really consider not buying a car because it needed a brake fluid change?!!! Or was a month or two over?!! WTF
 
You say you want to keep the car for ten years. How many miles do you do a year? If you do 5k miles a year and keep the car for 10 years and buy at 25k miles that would be a total of 75k miles. If you bought a 40k miles car and did the same miles that would be a total of 90k miles. A difference of 15k miles over 15 years. Does that really make a difference? Er, no.
 
i thought on the ///M other than the brake and coolant fluid which is two yearly, inspection and oil changes are on the milage
when this tipic comes around everyone always seem to get into a right old lather, cars can have the most water tight service history but still see bearing failure and the like :poke:
 
Zeld4 said:
You say you want to keep the car for ten years. How many miles do you do a year? If you do 5k miles a year and keep the car for 10 years and buy at 25k miles that would be a total of 75k miles. If you bought a 40k miles car and did the same miles that would be a total of 90k miles. A difference of 15k miles over 15 years. Does that really make a difference? Er, no.

Yes it does. A 1000 miles per year! :poke: :rofl:

I'll get me coat. :tumbleweed:

The thing is if you're not mechanically minded it's easy to get caught up on mileage, age etc as they are the measurements that give you confidence in buying something when you may not have the knowledge that these engines could probably go 200k miles.

Christ, she only asked the best time to buy - if I was her I'd tell you all to foxtrot oscar and not come back. :D
 
Zeld4 said:
You say you want to keep the car for ten years. How many miles do you do a year? If you do 5k miles a year and keep the car for 10 years and buy at 25k miles that would be a total of 75k miles. If you bought a 40k miles car and did the same miles that would be a total of 90k miles. A difference of 15k miles over 15 years. Does that really make a difference? Er, no.


Regarding your previous post, no I merely asked the question to see if MC owners felt this car was seasonal from their experience even though it's not a convertible. I also mentioned a confirmation over inspection 2 because there was discussion regarding the brake fluid intervals of the car Popey kindly linked to me, the inspection manual details that an inspection 2 includes brake fluid change.

I don't know why you are using the presumption of my annual mileage to attack my decision to look for a low mileage car, why on earth is this such a concern if it's what I want, as in 'I', the person who is buying this vehicle! :headbang:
 
Ninarvana said:
I don't know why you are using the presumption of my annual mileage to attack my decision to look for a low mileage car, why on earth is this such a concern if it's what I want, as in 'I', the person who is buying this vehicle! :headbang:
+1

You're the one spending the money and you're entitled to try to find/buy exactly the car you want - although I think that the comments advising you that you may be searching for some time were perfectly in order as you may not have realised how few of your desired spec/mileage are likely to be around... (I think that that point has been hammered home now though :wink: )
 
PerryGunn said:
Ninarvana said:
I don't know why you are using the presumption of my annual mileage to attack my decision to look for a low mileage car, why on earth is this such a concern if it's what I want, as in 'I', the person who is buying this vehicle! :headbang:
+1

You're the one spending the money and you're entitled to try to find/buy exactly the car you want - although I think that the comments advising you that you may be searching for some time were perfectly in order as you may not have realised how few of your desired spec/mileage are likely to be around... (I think that that point has been hammered home now though :wink: )


:) yeah I appreciate the advice when it's well placed and understand it may be quite the hunt, thankfully I'm not in any rush, however if this car above is the one then it may well be a case of a premature find instead. I'm hoping to be viewing the car on Saturday.
 
Merrsh1 said:
Zeld4 said:
You say you want to keep the car for ten years. How many miles do you do a year? If you do 5k miles a year and keep the car for 10 years and buy at 25k miles that would be a total of 75k miles. If you bought a 40k miles car and did the same miles that would be a total of 90k miles. A difference of 15k miles over 15 years. Does that really make a difference? Er, no.

Yes it does. A 1000 miles per year! :poke: :rofl:

I'll get me coat. :tumbleweed:

The thing is if you're not mechanically minded it's easy to get caught up on mileage, age etc as they are the measurements that give you confidence in buying something when you may not have the knowledge that these engines could probably go 200k miles.

Christ, she only asked the best time to buy - if I was her I'd tell you all to foxtrot oscar and not come back. :D
Haha yes I would probably do the same but it's fun being slightly annoying and once in a while if I get called a four letter word I'll just have to accept it:)
 
I've noticed a few on autotrader have dropped in price the past couple weeks. Some only by £250. Others by up to £1000.
 
Ninarvana said:
It's funny how marmite that sepang bronze is... I've never seen that colour on a Z in person but I'm quite taken with it from photographs I've seen, I think it's really unusual. I'd say the only colour on a Coupe that doesn't do it for me would be the Imola Red so each to their own. If we all liked the same things in life, it would be pretty boring!

Update:

The car Popey linked to me... The seller emailed me over a list of the service history which is as follows;
23.03.07 – Pre-delivery check.
17.09.07 – 1,518 miles: Running-in check.
04.04.09 – 9,510 miles: Oil Service and Micro-filter change.
25.04.11 – 14,848 miles: Inspection II, Micro-filter change and Air cleaner element.
20.04.11 – 15,739 miles: Approved used car check.
08.12.12 – 20,208 miles: Winter health check.
09.08.13 – 21,761 miles: Oil service, Brake fluid and Micro-filter.

Whilst there seems to be a typo between the inspection and UCC, one thing I'm learning is why is it so hard to find a vehicle that has a service history that makes complete sense. The running in check was 300miles late and its gone straight into an inspection 2 which is strange (or perhaps a dealer stamp error? etc)...

Thoughts?

Resurrecting an old thread, but since this car is still for sale, I thought I should post a note of caution for anyone considering this car. Assuming that this is the history detailed in the cars' book pack, then there are major discrepancies with this and the detail recorded by BMW. Please feel free to PM me for more info.
 
Ed Winchester said:
Ninarvana said:
It's funny how marmite that sepang bronze is... I've never seen that colour on a Z in person but I'm quite taken with it from photographs I've seen, I think it's really unusual. I'd say the only colour on a Coupe that doesn't do it for me would be the Imola Red so each to their own. If we all liked the same things in life, it would be pretty boring!

Update:

The car Popey linked to me... The seller emailed me over a list of the service history which is as follows;
23.03.07 – Pre-delivery check.
17.09.07 – 1,518 miles: Running-in check.
04.04.09 – 9,510 miles: Oil Service and Micro-filter change.
25.04.11 – 14,848 miles: Inspection II, Micro-filter change and Air cleaner element.
20.04.11 – 15,739 miles: Approved used car check.
08.12.12 – 20,208 miles: Winter health check.
09.08.13 – 21,761 miles: Oil service, Brake fluid and Micro-filter.

Whilst there seems to be a typo between the inspection and UCC, one thing I'm learning is why is it so hard to find a vehicle that has a service history that makes complete sense. The running in check was 300miles late and its gone straight into an inspection 2 which is strange (or perhaps a dealer stamp error? etc)...

Thoughts?

Resurrecting an old thread, but since this car is still for sale, I thought I should post a note of caution for anyone considering this car. Assuming that this is the history detailed in the cars' book pack, then there are major discrepancies with this and the detail recorded by BMW. Please feel free to PM me for more info.

When I checked the book in person Ed he had made a typo to me but like I discussed with you there is an error with the inspection as it is stamped as 'no' and has had no other inspections. Did you clarify this with BMW?
 
Ninarvana said:
Ed Winchester said:
Ninarvana said:
It's funny how marmite that sepang bronze is... I've never seen that colour on a Z in person but I'm quite taken with it from photographs I've seen, I think it's really unusual. I'd say the only colour on a Coupe that doesn't do it for me would be the Imola Red so each to their own. If we all liked the same things in life, it would be pretty boring!

Update:

The car Popey linked to me... The seller emailed me over a list of the service history which is as follows;
23.03.07 – Pre-delivery check.
17.09.07 – 1,518 miles: Running-in check.
04.04.09 – 9,510 miles: Oil Service and Micro-filter change.
25.04.11 – 14,848 miles: Inspection II, Micro-filter change and Air cleaner element.
20.04.11 – 15,739 miles: Approved used car check.
08.12.12 – 20,208 miles: Winter health check.
09.08.13 – 21,761 miles: Oil service, Brake fluid and Micro-filter.

Whilst there seems to be a typo between the inspection and UCC, one thing I'm learning is why is it so hard to find a vehicle that has a service history that makes complete sense. The running in check was 300miles late and its gone straight into an inspection 2 which is strange (or perhaps a dealer stamp error? etc)...

Thoughts?

Resurrecting an old thread, but since this car is still for sale, I thought I should post a note of caution for anyone considering this car. Assuming that this is the history detailed in the cars' book pack, then there are major discrepancies with this and the detail recorded by BMW. Please feel free to PM me for more info.

When I checked the book in person Ed he had made a typo to me but like I discussed with you there is an error with the inspection as it is stamped as 'no' and has had no other inspections. Did you clarify this with BMW?

Yes, I ran through the recorded history over the phone and only the last 2 services matched those recorded in the handbook, plus there was no running in service. This might have been an admin error at BMW, or the wrong service manual ending up in the car. But for me, there are too many question marks.

Thanks for sharing your experience of this one. It would have been a very long and disappointing trip if you hadn't prompted me to check the history.
 
Crumbs that is a massive discrepancy! Unfortunately I can't remember which dealer the book was stamped as having the running in service at. I did a full hpi on this car before I viewed it as I learned it had outstanding finance on it at the time of sale but notably it had a couple of number plate changes so perhaps the reg on the car wasn't the original reg and BMW only have the details listed via the original registrations on their database, food for thought? If that car didn't have it's running in check it's definitely one to avoid!
 
Back
Top Bottom