If I had to replace my manual with another zed now I would consider an auto, I do like the involvement of a manual but sometimes the ease of an auto definitely appeals. If it was a daily I would probably go auto but the difference in fuel economy (especially for a daily) puts me off somewhat. Around town my 05 3.0i manual gets about 30mpg rising to 36 or so on a weekend/week away. How do similar vintage autos fair in this respect?
The whole auto/manual debate has changed over the years and 25 years ago when I started driving I definitely wouldn't have gone auto (even if I was old like I am now!) due to the drawbacks/limitations of the auto boxes back then. More modern boxes, particularly Merc/Bmw ones are light years ahead of things back then. I recently drove a multitude of different 1/2 series cars (petrol/diesel/manual/auto) as the missus was looking to buy one. Honestly the auto box was brilliant and it left me questioning the need for the DCT box used in the M2 etc. I remember back in circa 2004 when one of the first of these dual clutch boxes arrived in the Audi TT. I loved it and it was a much better proposition than their auto box of the time. Now with the latest breed of autos I'm struggling to see a future for DCT etc.