Maniac said:I think the point here that LUX is making is that if his car was a year old, you're still charging for a 2 year warranty, for which only 1 year is valid? Surely it would make more sense to offer a tiered approach, a cost for the remap/work and then extra costs per year for the bolt on warranty? That way someone where the warranty only qualifies for a year, pays only for a year and not two.
Effectively the way your pricing works, you are penalising those with older cars. Charging for two years warranty where less may be applicable.
Yes, thanks Maniac....was I not putting it across correctly!!
