2012 M3 to get straight six turbo engine!

Breaker

Elite
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/260473/bmw_m3_to_get_turbo_power.html?CMP=NLC-Newsletters&uid=aed1643d06aad63b54eacbbaa392c489
 
If I was in the market for a new Z4M and was expecting a V8 this would put me off, it must be a very stressed engine :thumbsdown: should have been a V8
 
450bhp 3.0 straight six?

Sounds quite over-stretched. Porsche's 911 Turbo is managing only around 500bhp with a 3.8 litre and VNT turbos. M car my arse!

CSL for me please... :D
 
Not convinced by anything in this article. I think they just
made everything up... Who wants a massive turbo in a BMW?
 
It's probably true to some extent, the next M5 will also have a turbo engine, and that's the way most manufacturers are going, it's the only way to get the grunt with low CO2.
 
Usual Autoexpress story from nothing and crap cobbled together image from inside their own heads IMO. The only factual bit is the turbo engine and BMW have dropped enough hints about that previously.
 
I also prefer NA V8 to turbo-charged straight-six. Just hope the new engine will be more reliable than the one currently in 35i.
 
If this can all be believed then this will happen before the E89 gets a V8.... :evil:
HellFrozenOver-notext-640x.jpg
 
ksher said:
I also prefer NA V8 to turbo-charged straight-six. Just hope the new engine will be more reliable than the one currently in 35i.

Don't forget thought that the actual engine in the E89 is bulletproof. It's the bits bolted to it that have had teething problems. Mine seems well sorted now 18,000 miles in! When that 6 comes out in the M3, it should be well sorted by then!

I do think that a new Z4M is looking unlikely, but if it does come out it may still have the V8 in it! They used the 1st gen Z4M as a dumping ground for an engine they were phasing out. :wink:
 
Wondermike said:
It's probably true to some extent, the next M5 will also have a turbo engine, and that's the way most manufacturers are going, it's the only way to get the grunt with low CO2.

Well, it's not.

It's just the cheaper way.

Lamborghini and Ferrari have managed to lighten their cars and use ever faster spinning big NA motors, that are also greener than ever.

BMW are, imho, being very lazy.

Dave
 
Breaker said:
ksher said:
I also prefer NA V8 to turbo-charged straight-six. Just hope the new engine will be more reliable than the one currently in 35i.

Don't forget thought that the actual engine in the E89 is bulletproof. It's the bits bolted to it that have had teething problems. Mine seems well sorted now 18,000 miles in! When that 6 comes out in the M3, it should be well sorted by then!

I do think that a new Z4M is looking unlikely, but if it does come out it may still have the V8 in it! They used the 1st gen Z4M as a dumping ground for an engine they were phasing out. :wink:

Bulletproof status should really cover most of the engine though. Any engine is as good as bulletproof if you talk just about the block... :D

Also, I'd give it some more years. They are still generally fairly modern low mileage engines. 6yrs/100k miles+ will be when we can start to see if they are really solid or not (in my view)


But by all accounts it is a nice solid BMW engine, but how good it'll be with 450bhp! BMW already revised the cooling kit for it for an extra 30bhp, so for the extra 150bhp over the design power? It might be a bit more delicate?!

Dave
 
Some tuners (Schnitzer?) have got 370 bhp for this engine, but 450bhp with a 3 year warranty seems a big leap. But if you look at Evo or Scooby those engines are produced with big variances in BHP.
 
They write such sh*t in that magazine, the next gen M3 isn't due out till 2014 if you follow the cycles.
 
Don't forget that back in the late 80's there was a 2.9 litre twin turbo that happened to have 478BHP.

It was in car called the Ferrari F40. Don't recall anyone questioning that car's pedigree......
 
Back
Top Bottom