True-Blue said:I’ve owned both, 3.0Si all day long…![]()
Very much so. The weekend loaners I had when they came out, was the 2.5 litre engine and it fell very sluggish compared to the 3.0
True-Blue said:I’ve owned both, 3.0Si all day long…![]()
coldel said:Note that video is not comparing the SI versions which are significantly different.![]()
pvr said:True-Blue said:I’ve owned both, 3.0Si all day long…![]()
Very much so. The weekend loaners I had when they came out, was the 2.5 litre engine and it fell very sluggish compared to the 3.0
sars said:Funny I found the 2.5Si more zingy than the 3.0Si, shorter stroke etcetera
sars said:Sewing machine, really, are you twelve years oldhow can you describe a 215 bhp six cylinder engine as a sewing machine
oke:
and my meaning of zingy, an engine that revs freely. Also the difference in performance between the 2.5Si and 3.0Si is similar to the difference between the 3.0Si and the Z4M, and many 3.0Si owners on here have argued that that was enough. IMHO all the six cylinder models offer lively performance and the OP won't be disappointed with any of them.
sars said:Funny I found the 2.5Si more zingy than the 3.0Si, shorter stroke etcetera
What should it be? It’s got lots of receipts.pvr said:Servicing a bit odd - 4 years in between?