Z4M Coupe on the front cover of BMWCar magazine this month

AlZ4M said:
It's mine :)

Re the review- I think 'unbiased' might be too strong a term to use but generally speaking the magazine isn't going to have a problem saying that a Z4M doesn't live up to x previous model or y new model.

I don't think they'd absolutely tear it to bits but they aren't obliged to give glowing reviews just like they're not obliged to stick cars that they don't really like on the front cover!

That said, I haven't read it yet!
Click to expand...

Is your car stock or are there modifications?

In most reviews the Z4M doesn't score very high due to the somewhat unrefined suspension setup, the often compared Cayman always wins here.
I always wonder what the reviews would be like if the ///M was equipped with some of the 'must have mods' (e.g. upgraded springs, CDV delete, RTAB limiters etc).

I for sure like my car a whole lot better since these simple and cheap upgrades, day and night difference. 8)
 
In most reviews the Z4M doesn't score very high due to the somewhat unrefined suspension setup, the often compared Cayman always wins here.
I always wonder what the reviews would be like if the ///M was equipped with some of the 'must have mods' (e.g. upgraded springs, CDV delete, RTAB limiters etc).
Click to expand...

Hi I understand what you mean about comparing it too a Cayman, of course these cars were in the same segment bracket. BUT>>>>>> In my opinion cayman and Z4M are different cars altogether.
 
Finally got round to reading the article, great stuff. Makes me want an M albeit the Roadster. Sorry guys :D :thumbsup:
 
Rene_Z4MC said:
AlZ4M said:
Apologies for the delay in replying- it's a completely standard car on 39k.
Click to expand...

Ok clear, thanks :thumbsup:
Is there a link to actual article somewhere?
Click to expand...

Last time I checked you could buy an electronic copy of the article, albeit the purchasing experience is a little poor.
Although there is nothing better then smelling an actual magazine....mmmmm :thumbsup:
 
I wasn't asking for anyone to post it on the forum, but possibly someone could pm/email it to me? That would be nice.
 
With regard to copyright of a published printed document (i.e. book or magazine), I thought that it is possible to reproduce up to 10% of the entire work without infringement of copyright? Therefore, if there is an article within a magazine which is less than 10% of the entire published magazine, it would be possible to copy it and upload it to a website without infringement of the magazine's copyright. Here's some guidance: http://www.soas.ac.uk/infocomp/copyright/library/photocopying/ Are there any lawyers who can give the definitive answer?
 
Vanne said:
I wasn't asking for anyone to post it on the forum, but possibly someone could pm/email it to me? That would be nice.
Click to expand...

Could always back order it for a fiver tops. That's what I did, it is nice to keep!

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Lol forget about it, I read my mates copy.. But looking at it that way, that's possibly illegal too.. Lol then again I payed uk 25 pounds to post a b pillar cover for my coupe to holland. Now that to me is bloody wrong and should be illegal. That is daylight robbery. Anyways, you can keep your copy.
Cheers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom