Please bear in mind that I've had a lot of Z's over the years (since a new Z3 2.8 ) and spent a lot of time reading forums and car magazines. With the new 35 IS on order I am of course catching up on the gossip
Today I was looking through here / bimmerfest and was still intrigued to see many of the age old ancient Boxster / Cayman vs Z4 threads and comments / digs. So I did a 10 minute session on the Porsche website spec'ing a Cayman to rival the 35 IS to see if anything had changed since I last drove the porker.
After 10 minutes I had both cars specified fairly closely.
Bearing in mind that the Z4 is a convertible (and a very classy one with a hard folding roof) and the Cayman is a far cheaper coupe the difference is even greater. And to put it mildly there were a myriad of Porsche options that I didn't choose I'd have liked. I'm sure I could have got the Cayman close to £70k easily.
Conclusion. I'm still confused that people continue to compare these 2 cars as if they were the same price. And not just people on forums either, I stopped reading Autocar as they are practically owned / sponsored by Porsche. I think the Cayman is becoming a nice looking car (with many options specified) but it isn't remotely in the same price band / comparable on value to a Z. It would make more sense to compare to the Jag F-Types / etc.
For me the baby Porches are so expensive that I'd just skip them and go straight to an F-Type S or Aston Martin.
Today I was looking through here / bimmerfest and was still intrigued to see many of the age old ancient Boxster / Cayman vs Z4 threads and comments / digs. So I did a 10 minute session on the Porsche website spec'ing a Cayman to rival the 35 IS to see if anything had changed since I last drove the porker.
After 10 minutes I had both cars specified fairly closely.
- Z4 35 IS (my fairly high Spec) - Approx £40k after discounts.
P Cayman S (similar spec) - £62k and probably not able to negotiate anything substantial off.
Bearing in mind that the Z4 is a convertible (and a very classy one with a hard folding roof) and the Cayman is a far cheaper coupe the difference is even greater. And to put it mildly there were a myriad of Porsche options that I didn't choose I'd have liked. I'm sure I could have got the Cayman close to £70k easily.
Conclusion. I'm still confused that people continue to compare these 2 cars as if they were the same price. And not just people on forums either, I stopped reading Autocar as they are practically owned / sponsored by Porsche. I think the Cayman is becoming a nice looking car (with many options specified) but it isn't remotely in the same price band / comparable on value to a Z. It would make more sense to compare to the Jag F-Types / etc.
For me the baby Porches are so expensive that I'd just skip them and go straight to an F-Type S or Aston Martin.
