Hello all,
I have had an offer accepted on a 3.0i Auto I'm thinking of buying from and independent garagecand have done some research on the car using the MOT database: http://www.motinfo.gov.uk/html/home.html which has been a revelation!! I would like opinions on what the results were.
I found that the garage selling the car is the one doing its current MOT- although this doesn't get me necessarily suspicious i find it odd that the car has only covered 300 miles since its last MOT a year ago. Either the car has done barely any driving in a year (would this be a worry to anyone particularly?) or the garage could have clocked it and I would never know without ringing the previous owner (which I would do if I could). Is this being naive or over-sensitive?
Interestingly the vendor failed the car on its first MOT for ABS (a warning light was on indicating the problem) and power steering problems. 2 days later (with no additional miles on the clock) it was retested by the same firm and it passed. Is it reasonable to expect a car dealer to have properly repaired the car themselves? I can't help but think they would do the bare minimum to get it through, with a risk that they have disconnected the warning light...
The car is today having an AA inspection so who knows if they tested or report the things that were fixed in its MOT. If they come back as problems alarm bells would be ringing, but if the garage offers to fix them who would walk away and who would be ok with it if the work came with some guarantee?
The last issue for me is that the garage is 170 miles away if something went wrong
Thanks and sorry for the long post!!
I have had an offer accepted on a 3.0i Auto I'm thinking of buying from and independent garagecand have done some research on the car using the MOT database: http://www.motinfo.gov.uk/html/home.html which has been a revelation!! I would like opinions on what the results were.
I found that the garage selling the car is the one doing its current MOT- although this doesn't get me necessarily suspicious i find it odd that the car has only covered 300 miles since its last MOT a year ago. Either the car has done barely any driving in a year (would this be a worry to anyone particularly?) or the garage could have clocked it and I would never know without ringing the previous owner (which I would do if I could). Is this being naive or over-sensitive?
Interestingly the vendor failed the car on its first MOT for ABS (a warning light was on indicating the problem) and power steering problems. 2 days later (with no additional miles on the clock) it was retested by the same firm and it passed. Is it reasonable to expect a car dealer to have properly repaired the car themselves? I can't help but think they would do the bare minimum to get it through, with a risk that they have disconnected the warning light...
The car is today having an AA inspection so who knows if they tested or report the things that were fixed in its MOT. If they come back as problems alarm bells would be ringing, but if the garage offers to fix them who would walk away and who would be ok with it if the work came with some guarantee?
The last issue for me is that the garage is 170 miles away if something went wrong
Thanks and sorry for the long post!!