Disclaimer: Havent watched the vid
Personally I believe that the response to the hijackings wasnt as quick or efficient as it should have been, I am also willing to entertain the notion that this may be through an element of government convenience for the sake of a reason to attack but I dont believe it was orchestrated by the US Gov nor that the towers were brought down by a planned demolition.
There is an excellent video on YT where a blacksmith heats a bar of the same strength structural steel to a similar temperature as jet fuel burns, he then bends it with his pinky. The meme of "Jet fuel doesnt melt steel beams" tends to be the rational behind the arguments that are put forward but critically these beams dont need to become liquid for them to no longer be able to sustain their shape, simply being hot enough to buckle is enough.
Personally I believe that the response to the hijackings wasnt as quick or efficient as it should have been, I am also willing to entertain the notion that this may be through an element of government convenience for the sake of a reason to attack but I dont believe it was orchestrated by the US Gov nor that the towers were brought down by a planned demolition.
There is an excellent video on YT where a blacksmith heats a bar of the same strength structural steel to a similar temperature as jet fuel burns, he then bends it with his pinky. The meme of "Jet fuel doesnt melt steel beams" tends to be the rational behind the arguments that are put forward but critically these beams dont need to become liquid for them to no longer be able to sustain their shape, simply being hot enough to buckle is enough.

