Will these fit?

[Bing]

Z4M-2006, never mind how it looks, isn't that an MOT fail ?

 

[Z4M-2006]

I think any protrusion of the wheel/tyre from the arch is MOT failure......

I guess its down to the tester on the day if the car passes though....

 

[Adamski]

Of course you could run mega camber on the rears to tuck the wheel under the arch, but this looks isn't exactly a forum favourite


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[benben]

for a 19x 9.5 rear I would reccommend a ET of 33. for a none M that would sit almost perfectly flush with the fender. This is a good look for the car. Maybe even use 245 tyres to stretch em a bit.
Any more stretching or protruding outside wont look too nice in my opinion unless you are driving a jap car.

My question is, what is a flush look for the front 19x8.5 ET 35? or ET 38?

 

[aquazi]

Z4M-2006, never mind how it looks, isn't that an MOT fail ?

I think the mot states its allowed to protrude upto 5mm at its furthest from the bodywork.... Which in this case would be the lower part of the wheel arch, but that still wouldnt be a fail.

But should as it looks rubbish.


Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

 

[Machine monkey]

This is how a 9.5 ET 27 sits on the rear of a non M car...

Some people like how they sit,personally i think it looks gash...

I dont fancy getting involved in any of the other shenanigans on this post but i have 19x9.5 et 23 rear and 19x8.5 et29 front m3 wheels and before lowering the car they obviously looked simmilar to the above picture. After lowerring it was better no camber adjustment involved

I have 10mm spacers on the front


I have had to roll the rear arches and the front rubes on the plastic by the wheel arch. So just bare that in mind.