Why I'll always choose a manual gearbox...

Sketchley said:
If I thought for one minute I could change gear better and more optimally than a computer then I would have got a manual box. That being said video is great, the throttle feathering is brilliant.....

Still for a computer to change gear is not so easy!
I mean: If you look at a dsg, they can only preset 1 different gear. Some say these boxes are really fast, but some say they are even rubbishly slow. That all has to do with how the computer can predict the road, with it's only input speed, gaspedal data and brake data (maybe steering but than it's already too late for my point at least).
So if you're accelerating, it presets the next gear, and the shift is instananious (just switch 2 clutch plates).
But if you're accelerating, and immediately brake hard to get a corner, and very rapidly want to downshift, the computer could have preselected a higher gear (expecting acceleration) and suddenly has to select a lower gear. Not all dsg/dct boxes (or whatever the brand calls it) are good at those conditions. For those conditions the computer programming is very important.
An automatic (you know, with the torque converter etc) does not have this problem I think because all gears are permanently engaged. But there are an array of clutches (and the torque converter can be slow/a bit incosistent too, especially on the point that the impellor changes direction). Also with these systems they tend to be faster on the upshifts, and sometimes considerably slower on the downshifts (also when using the tiptronic). I don't know if that is a design limitation, it's something that sometimes grabs my attention when driving one.

Formula 1 cars and wrc ralley cars still have a more conventional manual setup (no dual clutch!). They use a dogbox (which is an unsynchronized conventional gearbox) with a shift selector drum. (like a motorcycle has, the complete system looks like that, and you can shift clutchless when pausing the throttle)
Maybe we'll see triple clutch gearboxes in the future. They do not have the above mentioned problem I guess. (I don't think dogboxes with shift selector drums will make it into passenger roadcars :lol: )

But both automatic gearboxes and dual clutch systems are shure making a lot of progress in the last years.
Still for a sportscar with 'spirited driving' the conventional manual gearbox gives me the most joy. Not only 'getting the shift just right', but also the feel of control and feeling more connected to the driveline (especially compared to an automatic), and having the feeling that 'you operate the machinery' instead of just driving the car.
 
While I agree with the downside perspective of DCT, ratios are so close that moving down several gears or up several gears one after another is more likely to happen than up and down one after another. There's little advantage to shifting down one gear and moving back up as there's just a few hundred revs in it, if that. With 7 cogs on the DCT its all about straight line stuff.
 
I don't mind auto boxes.... when I want to 'push on' I just use the flappy paddles/buttons...


I don't get the 'involvement' and 'joy' in what is essentially moving your arm and leg in manual changes...although it is always nice to get the revs matched on a downshift etc, or get my bike hooked up coming out of corner... but I get as much enjoyment out of driving an auto as I do a manual...
 
You can see that the dsg boxes do really well in (amateur)dragracing, provided that they can hold the torque and dont break (the liquid clutch is less suitable/needs more upgrading for high torque). For what Ive seen porsche pdk was really fast.
 
original guvnor said:
I'm going to be honest now, my car is almost too quick for use on public roads. Just a few seconds (a lot less than 10) and you are going well above the motorway speed limit and the M isn't THAT quick by modern standards. I'm starting to find it a bit frustrating and constraining. The opportunities to go banzai safely are getting fewer and fewer in number. The new M5/RS6/E63 are a classic example. They are going to lead to one thing - being in front of the magistrates, pleading for your licence.
This was one of the biggest frustrations I had with the M3 aswell & the only way to truly enjoy it was to turn a blind eye to speed limits & it genuinely only felt exciting to drive at 6000rpm plus & it did 110mph in third so you can understand where I'm coming from.

Most of the time driving around lincolnshire you are travelling in a flow of traffic on A roads with little chance of overtaking because of either cars coming the other way or several cars in front taking it steady, I did enjoy cog swapping to keep it on the boil though & because max power is at 8300rpm you really did have to get busy with the gearstick to make it feel like it is a fast car. :driving:
 
ronk said:
StevenH72 said:
Sketchley said:
If I thought for one minute I could change gear better and more optimally than a computer then I would have got a manual box. That being said video is great, the throttle feathering is brilliant.....

So where will you draw the line Sketchley? When computers also control the acceleration, braking, and steering more optimally than you can, will you be happy to enjoy your "sportscar" by just getting in and pressing the ignition?

Surely some enjoyment has to come from the process and not merely the outcome?


Does that include all the stuff like Anti lock brakes, Traction Control, Stability etc etc we have on modern cars ?

If we want seat of the pants motoring its a Caterham 7 of Westfield !

Yes. :thumbsup: It does include all the above in my book. Though ABS, in particular, does make the car a lot safer in certain conditions and does not detract from the driving experience IMO, so i'll let that one through. As for TC is off as soon as i'm sat in the car. :D

Alas for the cateram types, I can't fit in, nor an MX5 nor an Elise or I would likely be driving one at weekends & not the Zed. :P
 
Back
Top Bottom