mr wilks said:
Busterboo said:
You didn't. I know they do.
They didn't feel bad in comfort terms when i had them on my first E89 (23i) they just show their deficiency when trying to enjoy a more spirited drive

when they hit anything other than smooth tarmac

that unnervving skittishness leaves them intolerable for me .
Here's one for you to ponder over & may help you accept you are never going to be able to prove your theory right or wrong :wink:
3 E89,s all same spec
1 has 18inch non runflats & covers 6000 miles pa
2 has 19inch non runflats & covers 4000 miles pa
3 has 19inch runflats & covers 3000 miles pa
which one will get a split wheel first ?
I don't know. I
do know that my 18" 'normal' tyres have done 16,000 miles in the last year (not commuting miles - I drive the car for fun) and ...
1 they drive much, much better than runflats and ...
2 at 37,000 miles to date, the wheels ain't cracked (which, in Leicester, is remarkable).
However, as you say, perhaps they
look like saloon wheels & tyres.
In an ideal world, I'd like 19s with non-runflat tyres that drove as well as 18s on non-runflats, but,
since you say they drive only as well as 18s on runflats, I have no choice.