Bing said:
lacroupade, that is a fair point... I fear, however, that properly assessing the roads' fitness for speed will be judged too difficult / too expensive / to intelligent an approach that they'll just blanket change the limits by area.
This is exactly my worry too... I think the problem is that it is too easy to blame speed limits for accidents. Our house is on a unmarked road which is a shortcut to a local village school. It is just about wide enough for two cars to pass with care and there is a blind corner. Some parents complained to the school about how dangerous it is... I watched a very near miss occur one morning. A group of five or six parents, some with pushchairs in front of them, were standing in the road, just the other side of the blind corner. They weren't crossing the road, they were chatting in the middle of the road. There is a pavement no more than 4 metres away. A car came up the road - too fast, but probably not breaking the 30mph limit, rounded the corner and almost hit the people in the road. The driver was a mother who was late for dropping junior off at school. Thankfully, no collision actually occurred.
The result? They want to place a 20mph limit on the road. At all times, not just at school times. Now, I wouldn't have a problem with that per se, as the road is too badly potholed to drive quickly in any case. But they also want traffic calming. And speed bumps too. And possibly, they are considering a one-way system!!
Why? Because it is no doubt easier than trying to educate everybody concerned. The driver - a local who knew the area - was driving far too quickly around a blind corner. The pedestrians - adults - should have known better than to chat in the middle of the road...
Again, slightly off topic, but it illustrates that local authorities will always blame speed as the issue, rather than idiocy.