Lets assume identical vehicles (so same E85 platform):
- one with the E85 strut front end system
- one with an Upper a-arm in place of the strut
Trying to be as close to apples-to-apples comparison, assume all other parameters remain the same. So that means lower a-arm length/mount points constant, caster trail the same, king pin angle the same, pickup point materials the same (so either both have rubber or both have monoballs), caster and camber the same, etc. Purely "upper a-arm vs. strut" comparison here.
How much 'better' would the Upper a-arm version handle/perform/ride/etc.?
Chris
- one with the E85 strut front end system
- one with an Upper a-arm in place of the strut
Trying to be as close to apples-to-apples comparison, assume all other parameters remain the same. So that means lower a-arm length/mount points constant, caster trail the same, king pin angle the same, pickup point materials the same (so either both have rubber or both have monoballs), caster and camber the same, etc. Purely "upper a-arm vs. strut" comparison here.
How much 'better' would the Upper a-arm version handle/perform/ride/etc.?
Chris