nicollow said:Love it, 2 posts and already after more grunt!!
Yeah, ESS look like they have a good kit, that comes with a bit of thought behind it.![]()
Mr Whippy said:Yep, valvetronics and superchargers don't seem to mix so well.
No idea if there is a technical reason, or if just for after market companies it's more headache and cost than it's worth!?
And, it'd be cheaper to sell up and buy an Alpina or M Z4 at that level, in my view.
Dave
Wikipedia said:Surprisingly the engine block of the N54B30 is similar to the older generation BMW M54B30 engine - all aluminum with cast iron cylinder liners. This is because the newer N52 aluminum-magnesium engine block was not deemed as suitable for turbo-charging with the above-mentioned engineering goals
But the N55 has valvetronic and a single scroll. I heard somewhere it was a packaging issue for the N54, and that the N55 has a smaller and/or rearranged valvetronic package. Couldn't quickly find a reference though, so maybe I made it up.Mr Whippy said:Yep, valvetronics and superchargers don't seem to mix so well.
bcworkz said:This thread is probably done, but I'd like to respond to Dave's last post.
The valve push concept sounds plausible, but I think the valve springs are stout enough and the boost pressure low enough that that would not be a problem. There's a good explanation on how valvetronic actually enhances FI from one of M Power's engineers. Scroll down to below the blue/red cooling diagram:
http://www.bimmerfile.com/2011/09/25/qa-with-head-of-m-engine-development/
My foggy memory cleared slightly, now my recollection is valvetronic was left off the N54 due to packaging conflicts with direct injection, not forced induction.