So the median wage of just under 60k a year isn't enough for driving a train?
That’s just a driver. They are taking action on behalf of all rail workers within their union. The media will always focus on the highest paid to try and shame them.Dark Diggler said:So the median wage of just under 60k a year isn't enough for driving a train?
If you get a 'jumper', you get a bonus and unlimited time off for 'PTSD' on full pay, and free counselling for as long as required.Dark Diggler said:So the median wage of just under 60k a year isn't enough for driving a train?
pvr said:They are getting paid almost twice the amount as drivers anywhere else in the world.
Ian J said:pvr said:They are getting paid almost twice the amount as drivers anywhere else in the world.
And twice as much as my wife who is a nurse and who took four years to qualify for the job
I’ve worked in submarines and spent the last 26.5 years as an operational firefighter. My last four years as an instructor wearing BA up to six times a week for an hour each time in hot fires. I get a fraction of a train driver. My choice but I will not stand in the way of anyone seeking an improvement to their pay and conditions. It’s not just the pay.Scubaregs said:Private sector, Man tech in the chemical industry, same shift pattern as fire service so 12 hour shifts, 365 days a year, nights, weekends, weekend nights, public holidays etc. Can be in acid suit and full Breathing apparatus on top of a tanker connecting/disconnecting for unloading in all weathers. This particular chemical is fatal upon inhalation, there is no margin for error.
Get paid a bit over half of what has been quoted here for a train driver, have had one pay rise in 9 years. So no, little sympathy from me.
There will always be disparity in the workplace, always be occupations that are paid far less than they are worth, nurses, paramedics, etc and there will always be instances where some jobs are overpaid and driving a train certainly seems to be one of them.
pvr said:Bet you couldn't retire in your early fifties either on a fully funded pension where you had to contribute 5 pence a month in
Couldn’t agree moremr.tourette said:It is odd all the focus is on train drivers when they're actually one of the smallest minority of workers in the railway system but then i guess we wouldn't have the dramatic headlines and agenda for the Conservatives to try and destroy workers rights.. they employ many more low paid support staff who earn sub 25k p.a. that are going to stuggle to make ends meet this winter.
Scubaregs said:Say BR workers accept a 5% pay rise across the board.
5% of £60k = £3 rise for train drivers.
5% of £30k = £1,500 rise for someone on that salary.
Do you think the train drivers would be happy with a lower percentage rise than those on half their wages?
pvr said:Bet you couldn't retire in your early fifties either on a fully funded pension where you had to contribute 5 pence a month in :x