To video replay or not?

Poll Poll For or against video replay

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 88.9%
  • No

    Votes: 1 11.1%

  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed .

powerontap

Senior member
 Montreal
After all the fuss at the world cup regarding missed calls from the officials on the field, are you for or against having video replay in professional sports?
 
Football, Hockey, basketball, baseball.... every major sport has it except "Soccer" . It was OK before giant screens showed the world the refs mistakes plus, it will help stop the diving....show the fakers on the screen and yellow card them all.....
 
Don't mind my jubilation over here I cannot help myself, you see I am German/Canadian. I do think they should have had it this time around. It should have been 2:2 before halftime, goals do make a difference to the players spirit and willpower. However, having said that in this case the better team won. When they disallowed the second England goal, I said you guys better score at least 2 more goals and so they did. Still it be all over the papers. So yes we should and I think we will have re-play in 2014.

3D_germ.gif

schland.gif

schland.gif

schland.gif
 
According to Fifa they still have no intention of using goal line technology for the next world cup but have said they will probably have further officials on the by-line as they had in the europa cup, and anyone who watched that will know how much use they were.
What got me about that yesterday was how silent the entire crowd went when the goal was disallowed there was a stunned silence in the entire stadium from both sets of fans.

I did like Gary Linekars Idea to introduce an appeal process like they have in tennis and also to have it equally limited so that during a course of a match each side would be allowed upto 3 appeals which could then be viewed on the screens and a decision made from there, doing it that way would prevent pointless appeals for Diving etc and if a team use all 3 appeals they then have no right to contest any other decisions made by the officals.

However Mr Linekar also commented that after that disallowed Goal that this might now shut the germans up about 1966..............The words Pot and Kettle immediatly sprung to mind.
 
I just don't see what is wrong with the idea of something like the third umpire in cricket :idunno:

would cost next to nothing to implement :roll:
 
gannet said:
I just don't see what is wrong with the idea of something like the third umpire in cricket :idunno:

would cost next to nothing to implement :roll:

Why inject another 'fallible' human element when modern technology can ensure fair play...!
 
AlanJ said:
gannet said:
I just don't see what is wrong with the idea of something like the third umpire in cricket :idunno:

would cost next to nothing to implement :roll:

Why inject another 'fallible' human element when modern technology can ensure fair play...!
It would cost less though :D and tech can fail too :wink:
 
Nosa said:
I did like Gary Linekars Idea to introduce an appeal process like they have in tennis and also to have it equally limited so that during a course of a match each side would be allowed upto 3 appeals which could then be viewed on the screens and a decision made from there, doing it that way would prevent pointless appeals for Diving etc and if a team use all 3 appeals they then have no right to contest any other decisions made by the officals.

.

Sounds quite like US Football, I believe the coach can protest a call and if wrong he loses a timeout or gets a delay of game penalty if he's used up his TO's (US Football afficionados, please correct me here if I'm totally off base) Seems to work quite well IMO.
 
Back
Top Bottom