The September 2017 Photo Competition – COMMENTS

Gazhyde said:
srhutch said:
The reason that first image might look like a render is because that car has a Matt wrap on it so doesn't have the same gloss finish as normal paint.
Most likely, the matt wrap seems to change in different light conditions. Very difficult to consistently photograph it's colour, or explain what shade it actually is when asked. All I know is I bloody love it, and Rob takes awesome pics of it :thumbsup:

+1 to that - it is an absolute belter of a shot! :thumbsup:
 
WLH said:
First let me say “photoshopping” or using software to altering the digital images is permitted for this contest. It would be nearly impossible to police the contest if “photoshopping” was not allowed.

Altering photo images is as old as photography itself. Before the digital age the finished image was completed in the darkroom. There were numerous techniques used to alter and/or improve the image. Contrast was often adjusted and even contrast in just one area of a picture was adjusted by a process called dodging and burning. Even the final picture there was artist techniques to reduce skin flaws, wrinkles and blemishes. Dust spots on the lens were covered on the final picture using a soft lead pencil which in the past I have done many times myself.

In this LINK see how Ansel Adams describes how he used the darkroom to take a “straight print” or what photographers today call the raw image to an award winning photograph.

Each board member must make up their own mind as to how much “photoshopping” they will accept and vote according.

:thumbsup:

All images are altered, even straight out j-peg. The camera interprets the raw file. The dynamic range of the eye is far greater than any camera... so manipulation is needed to get close to what we see.... it's still a long way off though. Every image you see in publications and papers etc... is manipulated in some way or other. Dishing and burning was common place, even 60 yrs ago in the darkroom. :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top Bottom