Scubaregs
Veteran
daniel_c said:That's Sweden for youScubaregs said:If you are paying 600-700k euros for a G29, you have more to worry about than a 360 degree camera.
A new, fully specced M40i is around 850k euros here.
That's £715,000.
daniel_c said:That's Sweden for youScubaregs said:If you are paying 600-700k euros for a G29, you have more to worry about than a 360 degree camera.
A new, fully specced M40i is around 850k euros here.
daniel_c said:A new, fully specced M40i is around 850k euros here.
Haha, damn, of course! I meant 60-70k euros. Euro to SEK is pretty much 1 to 10. Sorry about that!Russ Z4 said:Surely you mean SEK?
daniel_c said:You mean 360-cameras haven't stuck around? Basically every new car on the higher-end scale has them, and the more expensive ones also stich the images into a 3d image, so can even rotate around the car, almost like if there was a drone flying around it.Russ Z4 said:They've never really stuck around though have they?
Check out the Mercedes implementation, which is actually now even available on the C-class, which is why it boggles my mind the Z4 doesn't offer it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsuTNpIrOPE
For me, it's really not about the walls, it's about curbs. For example, there's a mall where I live, with an underground garage, where you pass through a funnel of sorts. It's a two-way pass with a parking machine in the middle. It obviously wasn't intended for a 2-way pass, so the passes are extremely narrow, and have curbs on both sides. A lot of people obviously struggle with this, as evident by the curbs being all rubber scraped. Being able to perfectly center the car through this pass, with only a few inches of available space, is pretty hard, by all standards.
Also, the 360-cam helps you park way closer to curbs than I'm otherwise confortable with.
Thinking about it some more, I'd actually be happy with just an actual front camera, as they can show you exactly where the "tyre tracks" would go when creeping forwards.
Anyhow, I realise this thread doesn't have tons of discussion value, I guess there's not much point crying about it on forums :|
Russ Z4 said:daniel_c said:A new, fully specced M40i is around 850k euros here.
Surely you mean SEK?
Scubaregs said:A new, fully specced M40i is around 850k euros here.
Ah, yeah, that makes perfect sense! They also seem to be bundled with more premium packages as well, which could also explained why they're often missing on used cars.Russ Z4 said:I guess that I mean that surround cameras were never really a much clicked option and they certainly don't turn up much on used cars. I had it on my 640d and it definitely could be used quite effectively - but unless you have a very particular use case, it didn't really bring that much to the party. I could park OK with or without it. The dropping mirror is usually big enough driving aid. As you say though, if you are passing through a narrow pathway with kerbs either side, then yeah, I can see why you'd want it.
I don't believe any of these systems are required by law in UK.q96169we said:The £900 driving assistant pack gives you ACC and driving assistant which include lane change warning, approach warning, person warning, blind spot monitoring, crossing traffic warning, and rear collision warning. Among these systems, the lane change warning, approach warning, and person warning are standard even without the driving assistant pack (laws require them to be standard if remember correctly). The other three extra systems basically implemented on two additional radars attached to the side of rear bumper. However, none of them can stop driver from kerbing the wheel which is what the OP wants to achieve via 360 camera.
NS66 said:I find the reliance on all this modern technology makes us all lazy and carefree so to speak - me included. My daily drive (horrible EV) has all the gizmos. We managed for many years with our senses, mirrors our eyes !!!