mgrlane said:I would not love to see it but I would like to see your reactions if suddenly through no fault of your own your way of earning was taken away and you were left with 30% of your pensions etc and the savings you had as a 36 year old.
I think you misunderstood what mgrlane posted. His post was posing the question to you as if you weren't allowed to work. If the possibility of work was taken away. That wasn't the case for you. You lost your job, but there was nothing stopping you from finding another. It's different now. How can you apply for positions in companies that aren't operating?ronk said:mgrlane said:I would not love to see it but I would like to see your reactions if suddenly through no fault of your own your way of earning was taken away and you were left with 30% of your pensions etc and the savings you had as a 36 year old.
Really!!
I’m afraid you are well off the mark there - tough as it might have been.
I was 35 years old when company i worked for went tits up in 1982/83 .
I had recently taken on a big mortgage at 12% or more and my daughter had just been born - do you know what help I got???? £32 a week plus 10p a week for my daughter.
30% of my earnings would have been heaven on earth
So it has not been all beer and skittles for us either.
Argyll Andy said:I get what you’re saying but for me the big change is I now have 60%ish better protection than I had on Monday but yes until they complete the program the risk is still there for me, and other risk groups, but we are less likely to catch it and if we do our bodies are at least partially primed to try and deal with it.
Yes I will still be under restrictions for some time yet, some self imposed, to minimise my risk and also to reduce my risk of spreading it, but I’ll take that rather than be totally unprotected![]()
ronk said:I was 35 years old when company i worked for went tits up in 1982/83 .
I had recently taken on a big mortgage at 12% or more and my daughter had just been born - do you know what help I got???? £32 a week plus 10p a week for my daughter.
30% of my earnings would have been heaven on earth
So it has not been all beer and skittles for us either.
I've been through two recessions as well. I had a mortgage and ended up washing cars at a car rental firm. But it paid the bills. On Friday nights I made sure I went out with my friends. I took along enough money for 1 alcoholic drink (like a beer) or two soft drinks. But I still made sure I went out.ronk said:At the the time there was massive unemployment and even worse in the North East it was not easy to find work .
Trust me I tried!
There was no work - my livelihood had been taken away through no fault of my own and it made a big impact on family finances for a good while I can tell you.
There were many many more like me and I can say it was a very worrying time. It had an impact on our plans for a long time afterwards.
Z4C_er said:I've been through two recessions as well. I had a mortgage and ended up washing cars at a car rental firm. But it paid the bills. On Friday nights I made sure I went out with my friends. I took along enough money for 1 alcoholic drink (like a beer) or two soft drinks. But I still made sure I went out.ronk said:At the the time there was massive unemployment and even worse in the North East it was not easy to find work .
Trust me I tried!
There was no work - my livelihood had been taken away through no fault of my own and it made a big impact on family finances for a good while I can tell you.
There were many many more like me and I can say it was a very worrying time. It had an impact on our plans for a long time afterwards.
ronk said:I know what £500 a month buys now and know only to well what £32 a week bought then!
I’ve just applied a comparison tool and it shows:-
27828B30-4B4A-4BA2-BE27-34F8BE278A6F.jpeg
300% increase so my £128 would only be worth £384
Your £497 is well off the mark!
I remember the struggle as did many others at the time.
Flyingfifer said:Argyll Andy said:I get what you’re saying but for me the big change is I now have 60%ish better protection than I had on Monday but yes until they complete the program the risk is still there for me, and other risk groups, but we are less likely to catch it and if we do our bodies are at least partially primed to try and deal with it.
Yes I will still be under restrictions for some time yet, some self imposed, to minimise my risk and also to reduce my risk of spreading it, but I’ll take that rather than be totally unprotected![]()
But how can it be a change? Vaccine or not you can carry the virus that means even with a 100% vaccine rate you will be exposed to it and given that even with the vaccine youre apparently still as infectious for the same length of time... literally nothing has changed except if/when you get it you have a 60% better chance of fighting it off. I really do see this vaccine "silver bullet" argument that the government are pushing to be very rose tinted glasses at this stage.
ronk said:I had recently taken on a big mortgage at 12% or more and my daughter had just been born - do you know what help I got???? £32 a week plus 10p a week for my daughter.
30% of my earnings would have been heaven on earth
So it has not been all beer and skittles for us either.
TitanTim said:I thought with the Oxford vaccine it's been proved now it's stops the virus being passed on which I would have thought will change everything and things should get back to normal sooner rather than later, I can't see why things shouldn't unless a new strain variant pops up that's more resistant.
Tim.
ProfCJJ said:Apparently this vaccine has shown a 67% mean rate of blocking transmission. With those odds the R number will fall quickly the more people are vaccinated.
ProfCJJ said:Apparently this vaccine has shown a 67% mean rate of blocking transmission. With those odds the R number will fall quickly the more people are vaccinated.