D
Deleted member 32480
Guest
TitanTim said:Let's hope then increased hospitalisation of younger age groups in Europe is just a blip
Still no links for this one hey :wink: :nahnah:
TitanTim said:Let's hope then increased hospitalisation of younger age groups in Europe is just a blip
mgrlane said:TitanTim said:Let's hope then increased hospitalisation of younger age groups in Europe is just a blip
Still no links for this one hey :wink: :nahnah:
TitanTim said:mgrlane said:TitanTim said:Let's hope then increased hospitalisation of younger age groups in Europe is just a blip
Still no links for this one hey :wink: :nahnah:
Doesn't need any, point I'm making is the importance for ALL age groups to be vaccinated to minimise any future outbreaks and hopefully get life back to some sort of normality. I'm sure you would agree.
Tim.

ronk said:TitanTim said:mgrlane said:Still no links for this one hey :wink: :nahnah:
Doesn't need any, point I'm making is the importance for ALL age groups to be vaccinated to minimise any future outbreaks and hopefully get life back to some sort of normality. I'm sure you would agree.
Tim.
I wouldn’t bet my pension pot on that one Tim![]()
They can now even without anything to do with the vaccine, so what changes. If you turn up at a pub or shop and the owner just looks at you and says you are not coming in then that is that. They don't have to have or give a reason.mgrlane said:Nictrix said:The owner of a pub, shop or any business can refuse access to anyone now should they wish and don't have to give a reason. Some pubs and nightclubs don't allow access to anyone in jeans or trainers. Just as easy to say no jab no access should they want. That would be a business decision for them.
So are you saying that they can refuse entry to an under 16 year old, a pregnant person, some one with a disability (who can't take it) or someone who won't take it for religious reasons?
So this should be your last post in this thread then?Nanu said:Lets just accept that some people regardless of any facts or figures will always be able to counter them with other facts and figures from some source. You will never win an argument with such people. All I ask is that if we let them live in their world and live their lives according to their beliefs, they should stop peddling their nonsense, accept we won't change and let us live in ours.
Nictrix said:So this should be your last post in this thread then?Nanu said:Lets just accept that some people regardless of any facts or figures will always be able to counter them with other facts and figures from some source. You will never win an argument with such people. All I ask is that if we let them live in their world and live their lives according to their beliefs, they should stop peddling their nonsense, accept we won't change and let us live in ours.![]()
What "vaccine passport"? Have I missed something?pvr said:Got my first jab yesterday. Not the one I would have liked, but it will give me a vaccine passport at least.
Now for that headache ....![]()
Stevo1987 said:What "vaccine passport"? Have I missed something?pvr said:Got my first jab yesterday. Not the one I would have liked, but it will give me a vaccine passport at least.
Now for that headache ....![]()
If they do it, apparently you will be able to download a document from the NHS giving your details and details of when and what vaccine you had. It won't happen officially because our Government are scared of being unpopular and probably more scared of the human rights lawyers waiting in line. Even if it did happen, people will be selling forged ones at pub doors, and everywhere else for a fiver.Ole gits rule said:Its just a card to show which vaccine you have had and the batch number
Nanu said:They can now even without anything to do with the vaccine, so what changes. If you turn up at a pub or shop and the owner just looks at you and says you are not coming in then that is that. They don't have to have or give a reason.
Flyingfifer said:big pharma is your friend and absolutely 100% trustworthy especially with their immunity from any possible liability at any stage!
mgrlane said:Flyingfifer said:big pharma is your friend and absolutely 100% trustworthy especially with their immunity from any possible liability at any stage!
"I am sure the above is only a precaution. The big players in the market are very ethical and always put people before profit".
AstraZeneca
Penalty total since 2000: $1,148,775,284
Number of records: 21
Johnson & Johnson
Penalty total since 2000: $4,248,447,763
Number of records: 58
Pfizer
Penalty total since 2000: $4,660,896,333
Number of records: 71
GlaxoSmithKline
Penalty total since 2000: $7,822,200,258
Number of records: 34
Ref:
https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/
PS: Those numbers are so big- I can't even say them.

Flyingfifer said:What does this even mean, can you explain every single aspect of this because if you cant its obviously nothing more than just a dubious source thats probably totally fake
Flyingfifer said:So basically the vaccine only gives someone over 55 an ever so slightly better chance than a non vaccinated 25-34 year old. Really rubbishes the accusations of selfishness and claims of "you need to protect the NHS"
It will beNictrix said:So this should be your last post in this thread then?Nanu said:Lets just accept that some people regardless of any facts or figures will always be able to counter them with other facts and figures from some source. You will never win an argument with such people. All I ask is that if we let them live in their world and live their lives according to their beliefs, they should stop peddling their nonsense, accept we won't change and let us live in ours.![]()