The God Poll

Poll Poll What do you believe?

  • Theism

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Monotheism

    Votes: 5 7.2%
  • Atheism

    Votes: 32 46.4%
  • Agnosticism

    Votes: 13 18.8%
  • Humanism

    Votes: 4 5.8%
  • Pantheism

    Votes: 5 7.2%
  • Deism

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • Polytheism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Paganism

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Fideism

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Misotheism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dystheism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ditheism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Satanism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Animism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 4 5.8%

  • Total voters
    69

Marlon

Lifer
 Lancs.
What do you believe?

I haven’t listed all beliefs or their subcategories, and I realise they aren't all strictly 'beliefs', however I think I’ve covered the main areas.
Some of the categories aren't mutually exclusive; the divisions are an attempt to keep things simple.

Key:

Theism
The belief in the existence of one or more divinities or deities, which exist within the universe and yet transcend it. These gods also in some way interact with the universe (unlike Deism), and are often considered to be omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent.

Monotheism
The view that only one God exists. An eternally existent being that exists apart from space and time, who is the creator of the universe, and is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent.

Atheism
The belief that gods do not exist, or a complete rejection of Theism in any form. Some atheists argue a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of deities, while others argue for Atheism on philosophical, social or historical grounds.

Agnosticism
The belief that the nature and existence of gods is unknown and cannot ever be known or proven. An agnostic may just be someone who takes no position, pro or con, on the existence of gods, or who has not yet been able to decide, or who suspends judgment due to lack of evidence one way or the other.

Humanism
A broad category of philosophies in which human interests, values and dignity predominate. It has an ultimate faith in humankind, believes that human beings possess the power or potentiality of solving their own problems, through reliance primarily upon reason and scientific method applied with courage and vision.

Pantheism
The belief that God is equivalent to Nature or the physical universe, or that everything is of an all-encompassing immanent abstract God.

Deism
A form of monotheism in which it is believed that one God exists, but that this God does not intervene in the world, or interfere with human life and the laws of the universe. It posits a non-interventionist creator who permits the universe to run itself according to natural laws.

Polytheism
The belief in, or worship of, multiple gods (usually assembled in a pantheon). These gods are often seen as similar to humans (anthropomorphic) in their personality traits, but with additional individual powers, abilities, knowledge or perceptions.

Paganism
Encompasses a diverse community with some groups concentrating on specific traditions, practices or elements such as ecology, witchcraft, Celtic traditions or certain gods. Wiccans, Druids, Shamans, Sacred Ecologists, Odinists and Heathens all make up parts of the Pagan community

Fideism
The view that religious belief depends on faith or revelation, rather than reason, intellect or natural theology.

Misotheism
The belief that a God or gods exist, but that they are actually evil

Dystheism
The belief that a God or gods exist, but that they are not wholly good

Ditheism
The belief in two equally powerful gods, often, but not always, with complementary properties and in constant opposition

Satanism
A group of ideological and philosophical beliefs based on the character of Satan

Animism
The belief that souls inhabit all or most objects (whether they be animals, vegetables or minerals).

Other
For those who can’t find a suitable category, or for jokers who worship their Zeds, or for Jedi knights etc.
 
You missed out

Pollism
The misguided belief that polling the great unwashed will actually reveal the inner mysteries of the cosmos and that, if one studies the results and arranges them in the correct manner, enlightenment will follow


:wink:
 
Why is it called the character of Satan?
Why are the rest of them not called characters, after all they are all made up.
And while I do not believe in any god, surely if you do believe in any god you must believe in every other god including satan.
 
I find it incredible that people believe in a God, in this day and age, I think the proof is all around you, disease, war, incredible cruelty, where is Gods hand in all this ? In fact I suspect that people who believe there is an entity up in the sky looking after them, and that by mumbling a few words to him these get translated into actions must be deranged... As Monty Python said
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPriOQkKd6k
 
*****. NSFW. ******

Guess this means I won't be going to heaven. :)


150691_143545575795889_1206118871_n.jpg
 
Dav the wheel nut said:
OK you just need to get a hobby then :wink:
My hobby is philosophy (can that be a hobby?). I go on lots of philosophy forums and sometimes it spills onto here :)
 
Could "God" create a rock he couldn't lift ?

Thought not - complete bollox.

Next poll please :)
 
I put this on Facebook a while ago. entitled "so you think you are important"

https://www.facebook.com/richard.newall.714/posts/1207814009244202
 
Jasey said:
Could "God" create a rock he couldn't lift ?

Thought not - complete bollox.

Next poll please :)

Ah yes, the omnipotent God paradox - created by giving a God concept the property if existence.
An object that exists cannot be a square and a circle at the same time, because that is the nature of things which exist. A rock can't be a rock and not a rock at the same time. So if you give a God concept the property of existence, what happens? Well you get a God that can't be a God and not a God at the same time. He can't create something maximally heavy, and not lift it with maximal strength at the same time. It is clear that the laws of logic don't need an author to sustain them. All that is needed is for something to have the attribute of existence. If we give a rock concept the attribute of existence, the laws of logic are now acting upon it. Similarly, if we give a God concept the attribute of existence, the laws of logic are now acting upon it.
 
Marlon said:
Jasey said:
Could "God" create a rock he couldn't lift ?

Thought not - complete bollox.

Next poll please :)

Ah yes, the omnipotent God paradox - created by giving a God concept the property if existence.
An object that exists cannot be a square and a circle at the same time, because that is the nature of things which exist. A rock can't be a rock and not a rock at the same time. So if you give a God concept the property of existence, what happens? Well you get a God that can't be a God and not a God at the same time. He can't create something maximally heavy, and not lift it with maximal strength at the same time. It is clear that the laws of logic don't need an author to sustain them. All that is needed is for something to have the attribute of existence. If we give a rock concept the attribute of existence, the laws of logic are now acting upon it. Similarly, if we give a God concept the attribute of existence, the laws of logic are now acting upon it.
I use 4 words - you use 123 - But we're on the same page (I think) :thumbsup:
ps I didn't count them I don't care that much.
 
Jasey said:
Marlon said:
Jasey said:
Could "God" create a rock he couldn't lift ?

Thought not - complete bollox.

Next poll please :)

Ah yes, the omnipotent God paradox - created by giving a God concept the property if existence.
An object that exists cannot be a square and a circle at the same time, because that is the nature of things which exist. A rock can't be a rock and not a rock at the same time. So if you give a God concept the property of existence, what happens? Well you get a God that can't be a God and not a God at the same time. He can't create something maximally heavy, and not lift it with maximal strength at the same time. It is clear that the laws of logic don't need an author to sustain them. All that is needed is for something to have the attribute of existence. If we give a rock concept the attribute of existence, the laws of logic are now acting upon it. Similarly, if we give a God concept the attribute of existence, the laws of logic are now acting upon it.
I use 4 words - you use 123
ps I didn't count them I don't care that much.
That's how you get a Philosophy degree... expound until the examiner either dies of boredom or gives you a passing grade :evil:
 
Back
Top Bottom