Z4good said:
Caddyshk said:
DannyBoy said:
As fuel prices begin to creep up again, I find myself getting frustrated with the fuel cosumption of my car again.
By a HONDA or get over it - Horsepower costs Money

There are some fast electric cars now being produced.
I have to agree with Caddyshk; If you wan't to play, your gonna pay. The first thing I do after startup is hit the sport button. My trip computer says 21mpg but I could care less. Then again, I've only put 28,000 miles on a 2003.
Caddyshack, thanks for the input. The point of the thread is to ascertain if there is issue with the mechanics of the 2005 3.0 auto I appear to have been blessed with. Reported MPG on the said vehicle model type reportedly ranges (from other user's cars), as I have previoulsy stated, from 22-28 mpg over a full tank. Reported mileage by other owners at worse is 250, mine returns 210.
With the price of fuel being what it is, 22mpg is going to sting anyone who uses the car frequently.
For my money I'd rather have a 3.2 boxster s and return 27MPG average over a tank. Whether it be specifically my car or all 3.0 autos, 22mpg is not a pleasant return.
I'm not asking for your advice in relation to my car choice, I'm educated and sensilble enough to make a reasonably well rounded decision, as was I upon purchase of my first Z4 (a 2.2) in early 2004. Hows the snow??
The thread asks for MPG, mileage and average speed......not your opinion on which car I should be driving.
Horsepower does indeed costs money, that said, 231bhp with a return of 22mpg is unacceptable in Europe. Perhaps in the good old US of A your more liberal in burning fuel, Europeans are not. :wink: Hence the diesel revolution.
