Adamski said:I think once we have facts (not here-say), action should be taken to stop the perpetrators killing more civilians
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jimmybell said:Hah this thread..
A few points..
I don't care who you are, or what your opinion is.. 100k civilians dead? someone needs to do something. fact. There are snipers shooting at children on a daily basis in parts of Aleppo.
I know a few Syrian nationals, who happen to live in London but basically all send money back to Syria. They say it's now a case of neither side is better than the other, Assad was terrible, but now there's Al Qaeda mixed in with the rebels the majority civilian body supports neither. Assad needs to go, but leaving the country without leadership and government for the likes of large global terror organisations to take hold is not an option, and would likely lead to a worse situation.
Air strikes seem pretty pointless, the evidence so far suggests chemical weapons were fired using Iranian shells, they're not dropped from air assets.. so bombing airfields and military bases is largely useless... unless you bomb them all, and assume they never have any weapons outside military bases.
The French and the Arab League (oh you need to buy more oil Mr Obama?) are sat back poking 'The West' (UK & USA) to do something, unwilling to step in themselves. The only good outcome would be UN peacekeeping intervention, or at least NATO - but the UN has allowed 100k deaths so far, and no evidence they collect from weapons inspectors will prove who launched the weapons (don't forget.. this could just be Al Qaeda setting off bombs) so i doubt they'll do anything fast enough.
The US can't be seen to be arming rebels much more than they already are as they're essentially giving guns to Al Qaeda, so the CIA have been lightly orchestrating this through the Saudis and Jordan, with wedges of ex-Chechen conflict equipment. Equally with Hezbollah, Iran, Russia, China all backing Assad we can't do anything Iraq style.
At the end of the day, i don't want the UK involved in any more conflicts than we have to and i really think the UN needs to do something, but i'm not happy that 100 thousand.. one hundred thousand.. people are dead, and nobody has done a thing about it. If we do nothing, the death toll WILL rise, no plan will ever be perfect and without unwanted casualties but we may be able to do something to stop this.
With regards to the Daily Mail conspiracy theorist.. you made me chuckle, but i guess if you think there's any truth to it, ring the journalist!

Izice said:original guvnor said:I wondered how long it would take for the conspiracy theorists to turn up and blame everything on the Americans (again).
Usual sniping comment of no value...go back to sleep gumbo.
ronk said:Topple the regime and have yet another bunch of Muslim Radicals in power? Then what?
ronk said:Topple the regime and have yet another bunch of Muslim Radicals in power? Then what?
Afraid there's no easy answer - We all base our opinions on the opinions of the press.
original guvnor said:Izice said:original guvnor said:I wondered how long it would take for the conspiracy theorists to turn up and blame everything on the Americans (again).
Usual sniping comment of no value...go back to sleep gumbo.
Well that got a bite. Congratulations, gullible as well as deluded.![]()
![]()
Bing said:Just been reading the latest on the BBC website. Question occurred to me - if the US performed 'surgical strikes' from their fleet in the Med, do you think the Syrians would shoot back ?
Izice said:ronk said:Topple the regime and have yet another bunch of Muslim Radicals in power? Then what?
Afraid there's no easy answer - We all base our opinions on the opinions of the press.
I dont
domsz4 said:Izice said:ronk said:Topple the regime and have yet another bunch of Muslim Radicals in power? Then what?
Afraid there's no easy answer - We all base our opinions on the opinions of the press.
I dont
So if you don't read the press then where do you get your opinion from? You've already quoted the daily mail and the guardian
Granted the papers are not always non biased but they are the only source of info we have. We could read press from othe countries, maybe pick up a few feeds for news etc but what's to say they are not bias either?
I watched a clip of a little boy crying that he'd been split from his parents after his dad tried to save him. It could have been rigged I guess just as easy as tony Blair lied about the wmd's
One thing is for certain until an team if international scientists and observers can investigate then no one will know. Last report I read the Assad bunch were still denying access so what are they hiding? If the rebels did it to themselves (which is entirely possible) in the hope of gaining favour then they would be opening the door for the inspectors with open arms and assads bunch wouldn't stop them.
corsaire77 said:I hope that no BMW vehicles will be damaged during the air raids.

teamemmenracing said:Just thinking out loud here after reading all the posts .......
If the UK decides to drop bombs on Syria, regardless of the justification (justification will always be an opinion and will change dependant on the point of view) .......
........ would it be ok for Syria to detonate bombs in London in self defence (again the justification woul be in their opinion .....)
Comments ? .............
Im thinking along the lines that if someone raped my daughter for example because he thought she deserved it ...... I would without doubt kill the fecker .......and argue all day long that I felt justified