To be fair the original story isn't clear what happened.
Sounds to me they were both in the car, thief in the driver's seat and the owner handed the key over but the thief then wanted to move the car off the drive and I'm reading it that the owner might have been concerned as the drive was steep or something so wanted to move the car off the drive himself so got out the car to swap seat to move the car and of course the thief then just drove off. Split second lapse and could happen to anyone really.
But yes handing the key over and getting back out the car was an error. Will be interesting how the insurer handles it as technically the key was freely handed over, but is there any difference to leaving the car running on the drive in winter to defrost and unattended?
I guess asking for identification i.e. passport or driver's licence or and proof off address might have made a difference.
Tim.
Sounds to me they were both in the car, thief in the driver's seat and the owner handed the key over but the thief then wanted to move the car off the drive and I'm reading it that the owner might have been concerned as the drive was steep or something so wanted to move the car off the drive himself so got out the car to swap seat to move the car and of course the thief then just drove off. Split second lapse and could happen to anyone really.
But yes handing the key over and getting back out the car was an error. Will be interesting how the insurer handles it as technically the key was freely handed over, but is there any difference to leaving the car running on the drive in winter to defrost and unattended?
I guess asking for identification i.e. passport or driver's licence or and proof off address might have made a difference.
Tim.