ph001 said:Don't underestimate the importance of perfectly optimised length and profile of the intake system. There is a ton of complex fluid dynamics and resonance going on due to the pulse nature that the engine pulls air in. BMW spend millions of dollars on this stuff. You can't expect to chuck a half finished intake on there and get good results.



RedUn said:There's a further piece you can buy to finish the box off which will move the intake closer to the feed pipe.
Its also got a much more aerodynamic shape to the inlet so I imagine that will help at high rpm, a straight edge like you've got won't be helping.
By the way, I've no idea how much the bell mouth shape will help but without a doubt it will help.
You can buy a genuine one from bmw but you will need to mess with the flap or karbonious sell a full carbon one that's nice 8)
Nice work on the car by the way![]()
TomK said:@FD3S, did karbonius or your tuner have any view on how the box would run without the snorkel piece?
There's some boxes out there that don't even bother with it so I can't imagine it makes a huge amount of difference?
foto07.jpg
So they were using 5th gear rather than 4th I guess (like mine peaking at 157mph), I dunno, as I said I'm no tuner... but it's different for some dynos afaik. You'd think the guy with the dyno would know what they are doing and the guy with the map likewise! You can really tell by logging IATs whilst doing the run and see where you are.FD3S said:I have discuss this with Randy too and when I proposed the custom snorkel as a solution he told me that " the guys from the dyno were running it to 170 MPH and the run was WAY too long. The heat buildup is WAY too much." I can't understand if it is the dyno fault how a run can be shorter.
It dosen't really matter which is used as long as the tuner is aware, they just have different resistance which affects the scale of the map.Vanne said:Tom, I think both oem CSL temp probe and the bimmerworld one (Randy recommends) are exactly the same internally. I have my temp probe in exact the same position. I have seen numerous m3's here that have relocated the temp probe to the lip of the snorkel to combat heat soak. Does it work? Dunno, possibly.
I don't think it's numbers he is/should be chasing, it's the shape of the curve that is important here, numbers irrelevant.Vanne said:Lovely box mate, hope you get the numbers your chasing. Subbed.
Vanne said:FD, mate that box is perfect, no real snorkel required, esp for a dyno, as it's not forced air at that stage anyways. In the real world I don't think.it makes any, if all diff between having a snork or not.
Tom, I think both oem CSL temp probe and the bimmerworld one (Randy recommends) are exactly the same internally. I have my temp probe in exact the same position. I have seen numerous m3's here that have relocated the temp probe to the lip of the snorkel to combat heat soak. Does it work? Dunno, possibly.
Lovely box mate, hope you get the numbers your chasing. Subbed.
TomK said:So they were using 5th gear rather than 4th I guess (like mine peaking at 157mph), I dunno, as I said I'm no tuner... but it's different for some dynos afaik. You'd think the guy with the dyno would know what they are doing and the guy with the map likewise! You can really tell by logging IATs whilst doing the run and see where you are.
TomK said:It dosen't really matter which is used as long as the tuner is aware, they just have different resistance which affects the scale of the map.
Not sure if FD3S's problem is heatsoak but it is a suggestion worth investigating
TomK said:I don't think it's numbers he is/should be chasing, it's the shape of the curve that is important here, numbers irrelevant.
Babw said:FD3S like you I couldn't justify £400 for the Karbonius Snorkel so am going with the Geoff Steel Racing FRP one for £150.
I too my Karbonius out of the packaging today, the finish is beautiful but looking inside the airbox there seems to be a small gap where the two parts of the box meet. Wondering if yours is the same?
Vanne said:Haven't actually had the time to go Dyno mine, prob should, and prob will in the near future, but several of my mates have the same car and setup and it pulls as strong, if not stronger than theirs. (minus the de-cat)
Id be very interested in the story about the IAT probe, i happened to have both here, the Bimmerworld (Randy's one) doesn't actually fit the Karbonious box in the place where its supposed to go, i guess you can use the other one if you stick it somewhere else..
Temps are coming down here are we speak, so will be hitting the track real soon.
the Dyno is normally done with the hood up, so that would negate any snorkel /ram effect anyhow, and i think even heat soak will be standard wether you have the temp probe internally, like OEM or somewhere else externally.
(thats dyno, real world results might differ)
Vanne said:interesting.. ill keep a watch on this thread to see how it develops.
Did Randy get back to you in regards to the IAT probe difference?
Vanne said:Cheers V.
Ive got a few busy weeks coming up, but after that ill see if i can get a dyno done for comparison.
I never got it done, as its more about drivability for me.![]()
ga41 said:Just noticed this thread! I remember months ago when FD3S visited Cyprus and we went for a quick coffee, he was telling me all the mods he wanted to do and I was thinking to myself "This boy is crazy" (in a good way!) haha!
@FD3S, your car is amazing and the mods on it areI am sure you will get to the bottom of you issues soon! Only thing left is a nice brake kit and then a trip to Serres!
![]()