Kryton said:£100k for a car that does not have the BHP=rip off :thumbsdown:
Kryton said:£100k for a car that does not have the BHP=rip off :thumbsdown:
aquazi said:Kryton said:£100k for a car that does not have the BHP=rip off :thumbsdown:
acceleration will be pretty brutal 0-62 4.4s is pretty damn fast.
Kryton said:aquazi said:Kryton said:£100k for a car that does not have the BHP=rip off :thumbsdown:
acceleration will be pretty brutal 0-62 4.4s is pretty damn fast.
Not for a £100k car it isn't![]()
tomscott said:Kryton said:aquazi said:acceleration will be pretty brutal 0-62 4.4s is pretty damn fast.
Not for a £100k car it isn't![]()
Dont see how brand new 911 Cs is 90+ with a few options similar price similar performance... and it does a 3rd the MPG
Kryton said:The quote was "pretty dam fast 4.4 s"..... 991S 4.1s (at the most) with Sports Chrono cost £90+k,
The mpg figure won't be anything like that say 65-70 mpg, however spending £100k on a car, mpg is of little consequence![]()
StevenH72 said:Kryton said:The quote was "pretty dam fast 4.4 s"..... 991S 4.1s (at the most) with Sports Chrono cost £90+k,
The mpg figure won't be anything like that say 65-70 mpg, however spending £100k on a car, mpg is of little consequence![]()
4.4s is still "pretty damn fast", even if it isn't the fastest car available.
the 570 Nm of torque (compared to the 991 S' of 440 Nm) will certainly help the car perform better (and feel much faster) when exiting corners, overtaking or generally planting your right foot.
I cannot see how anybody can be negative about this car's performance.