Mister_dj said:
Excluding ground clearance, a zed with winter tyres will probably be better in the snow than any other car without winters (4x4 included).
A 4x4 gives a false sense of security, as it is only superior in traction, but when braking all cars are the same. Although obviously a 4x4 with winters is the best possible combination,
I understand the sentiment of what you're saying but it is a bit far fetched in it's broad brush generality.
The achilles heal of the Zed is a combination of RWD, low rear end weight, wide tyres and too much power, aside being too low. Add to that low profile (so can't be aired down for compliance traction without risk of rim damage) and it's dead in the water. Winter tyres make some significant improvement, but any light weight FWD supermini on narrow tyres with weight over the front will out perform it on snow and ice.
While 4x4 do give greater traction to pull away they also give greater stability in corners by applying power to 2 or 4 wheels (depending on design). Granted that if you lock the brakes then they''ll slide regardless as that's the laws of physics. However, add the weight which cuts better into snow, generally more aggressive tyres AP or even MT's, narrower and again it will perform better.
As a regular 4x4 competitor in muddy terrain and Ice events in the Alps, Sweden, etc. I can explain further why I take the Jeep not the Zed if required
For my sins this year I now have the ultimate useless cars in a Zed and Jag XF for Winter driving and may have to get competition cars out to get around - should be fun...