Hi Dom,
The yellow curve is the drag correction, but as said, it's incorrect really... drag would be higher than that, which in turn would result in a lower power/torque figure.
But in this instance I was looking for the correct shape of the curve. Since variables such as exact atmos pressure, air temp, and vehicle weight were not known, along with other factors, then it was hard to correct to flywheel power from net wheel power.
Iirc, the run was done in 2nd gear. It is a net wheel power plot (power = mass x acceleration x speed) reversed out to give torque from the rpm logging, and then corrected back to flywheel power/torque after correcting for other variables.
But as said, the shape is right here which was the main goal.
Yep 6k rpm is good enough to change really. And I drive with sport off quite a lot too since there is no benefit to it unless you are on open roads where you are not gonna be lifting off in a few seconds due to traffic ahead etc
Dave
The yellow curve is the drag correction, but as said, it's incorrect really... drag would be higher than that, which in turn would result in a lower power/torque figure.
But in this instance I was looking for the correct shape of the curve. Since variables such as exact atmos pressure, air temp, and vehicle weight were not known, along with other factors, then it was hard to correct to flywheel power from net wheel power.
Iirc, the run was done in 2nd gear. It is a net wheel power plot (power = mass x acceleration x speed) reversed out to give torque from the rpm logging, and then corrected back to flywheel power/torque after correcting for other variables.
But as said, the shape is right here which was the main goal.
Yep 6k rpm is good enough to change really. And I drive with sport off quite a lot too since there is no benefit to it unless you are on open roads where you are not gonna be lifting off in a few seconds due to traffic ahead etc

Dave