WNeill said:Got to agree with marchantsuk, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, who gets to make the definition?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Correct, but I do wish the papers/media etc would give the full story when they remember him. I don't mean to take away from all the good he did for one second, and it's through the change in him that he brought the change in the world, he extended the hand of peace and friendship to his enemies and showed great humility in doing so, but the times before these are still part of him and what made his subsequent actions so powerful. Yes he made mistakes, yes he probably regrets some of the things he and the MK did and yes all the good he did and his acts and actions since those days possibly "make up for" the bad (if such a thing is possible), but the MK campaigns, arms proliferation under his premier and early part of his life still occurred, and if as many suggest they were warranted or subsequently proved to be righteous why whitewash over them as if they don't exist. Saints and perfection don't exist, so let's not pretend they do.