Popey said:I understand things have gone wrong for some members. However if you can post negatives, it would make sense you can post unbiased and accurate reviews.
Scubaregs said:Popey said:I understand things have gone wrong for some members. However if you can post negatives, it would make sense you can post unbiased and accurate reviews.
So are you saying the negative reviews posted were biased and inaccurate?
Concur.Popey said:Scubaregs said:Popey said:I understand things have gone wrong for some members. However if you can post negatives, it would make sense you can post unbiased and accurate reviews.
So are you saying the negative reviews posted were biased and inaccurate?
No not at all. The point I was getting at is that if you can leave negative feedback you should be in a position to leave a positive review.
Problem is that by reviewing the business, you are advertising for him and promoting the business, in a way. As he was banned from the forum, promoting him won't be allowed. I think he was banned partly for using the forum to blatantly promote his business for free IIRC.Popey said:The point I was getting at is that if you can leave negative feedback you should be in a position to leave a positive review.
I read the complete post linked to earlier in this thread. By no means was it all one way. Several people reiterated what he had done for them and how pleased they were with his work. I think that thread portrays an accurate description of events and by reading it you can see that the quality of his work and his knowledge are not in dispute. The issues arise with his lack of communication and somewhat short fuse. The playing field in that thread is fully covered, from one end to the otherPopey said:But he's been rubbished and that remains on the forum (freedom of speech). I am not fighting his corner, I just want a level playing field for all.
What he's done in the past is not relevant to my experience.
enuff_zed said:I read the complete post linked to earlier in this thread. By no means was it all one way. Several people reiterated what he had done for them and how pleased they were with his work. I think that thread portrays an accurate description of events and by reading it you can see that the quality of his work and his knowledge are not in dispute. The issues arise with his lack of communication and somewhat short fuse. The playing field in that thread is fully covered, from one end to the otherPopey said:But he's been rubbished and that remains on the forum (freedom of speech). I am not fighting his corner, I just want a level playing field for all.
What he's done in the past is not relevant to my experience.
I was removed from that one by the delightful Lisa Evans.Rockhopper said:I'm in a few Facebook Z4 groups, one of them is incredibly pro Mike, in fact almost every post for help is met by a reply along the lines of "take it to the zed shed" - posted by multiple different members. I assumed it was his group but i don't think i could see his name in the members list.
enuff_zed said:I was removed from that one by the delightful Lisa Evans.Rockhopper said:I'm in a few Facebook Z4 groups, one of them is incredibly pro Mike, in fact almost every post for help is met by a reply along the lines of "take it to the zed shed" - posted by multiple different members. I assumed it was his group but i don't think i could see his name in the members list.
I talked a chap in Cambridge through all the fault finding on his roof.
Proved it was the module.
Told him I had one cheap.
She banned me for being a trader!
Seems only one person is allowed to 'trade' on that particular page. :rofl: