Vornwend said:Even if they had a choice and it was the best place for them it does not excuse discrimination - that still remains a problem to be addressed doesn't it?
You are right to say that its not just skin colour. I don't imagine it will ever be possible to remove all forms of discrimination but the more we expose it, increase our awareness of it and work to reduce it the better off we will all be IMO. You don't get the best out of people by discriminating. One of the most powerful lessons I learnt in my career was that if you walk past a problem then that is the same as accepting it. I think there is a problem and I think the protests that flare up are evidence of that (alongside all the hard data). Protest is a catalyst for change - whether that be giving women the vote, abolishing slavery, equal pay, the right to a state education etc etc If a few statues and ancient TV programmes get ditched along the way towards racial equality well then for me that's a tiny price to pay - and I speak as a huge Fawlty Towers fan!!
I do NOT condone discrimination of any kind as a political strategy for possibly the same reasons that you do. However, what we are all up against is the instinctive tribal and territorial behaviour of our species, Homo Sapiens. We are hard-wired to behave as we do because it is our instinct which runs deep in us all and it's all about survival of one's own: the selfish gene.
Whilst it is laudable to share what you have with strangers, in a survival situation, it is not the best strategy of the species. Therefore it is contra-instinctive for people to behave in an idealistic way.
Is the ultimate result of attempting to create racial equality the fulfilment of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan?
