TDJ said:Further justification for getting a coupe right there.
Bing said:TDJ said:Further justification for getting a coupe right there.
I don't think so - firstly, the roll-over protection (which isn't required, fortunately) is already deploying as the crashing vehicle starts to pass the front of the camera car. And secondly, this is ALL about wearing a seat belt.
TDJ said:Bing said:TDJ said:Further justification for getting a coupe right there.
I don't think so - firstly, the roll-over protection (which isn't required, fortunately) is already deploying as the crashing vehicle starts to pass the front of the camera car. And secondly, this is ALL about wearing a seat belt.
Was purely tongue in cheek. All about wearing a seat belt, and not weaving in and out of fast-moving traffic like a lunatic.
pvr said:If it is that bloke splitting in two, why would that have happened.
pvr said:Having looked at the video from a move point of view, he must have really slung his car behind that little car, then on the inside lane, then cut the little car up again to go in front of it - obviously completely unbalancing the car.
Interesting to see that for that old model, the indicators come on after the accident. I thought that was only on the much, much newer models.