Yep, you keep believing!B21 said:Looks like I’m the perfect owner..full house..
B21 said:I see my old TJ Jeep took a hammering
B21 said:I guess you are evolving it anyway..
vehiclescore said:My car was 954 due i think mot failure, headlight aim!
So why did my Z4 get a pathetic 564 when it is ultra low mileage, full history and immaculate with no MOT advisories of note?vehiclescore said:Still an ace score dude!
Pondrew said:did my Z4 get a pathetic 564
Not that bothered TBH. But good luck with it!vehiclescore said:Can you give me the reg’s so I can check this for you? It depends on so many variables that I could not give you an answer without checking myself.
vehiclescore said:B21 said:I guess you are evolving it anyway..
The algorithm takes into a huge amount of data. I have a database of around 60 million UK vehicles with Mot histories, average mileage, scrapped mileage etc etc. I use all of this to see common patterns with vehicles that deteriorate at a set age, average mileage etc. equally, it will scan a MOT to check if any general big issues have shown up such as Oil leaks, Engine knocking, rust on chassis. Some of which are classed as ‘advisories’ which are actually detrimental to a vehicle’s health.
The website has been designed to allow not so vehicle-educated users understand if a vehicle is good, bad, reliable, all within a simple score. It’s very complicated to get the score absolutely accurate. But it’s getting better and better every week.
Zed Baron said:I took it for a sprint around Loch Lomond a couple of weekends ago and it still drives like new

It's cos your Scottish! Racist they are!Argyll Andy said:Given this info, curious how my Z4, which is under 2 yrs old gets a very poor score? Lack of MOT history etc have an adverse score weighting?
