Nictrix said:I wouldnt choose either of them but if forced I think it would be the S1000rr.
I dont particularly like v-twins and to live with every day I think the Ducati would be a pain.
Small tank means short journeys and having to plan fuel stops every 80 miles.
The BMW however has been reported as not very well built with corrosion setting in on the engine covers early in their life.
Not had a go on one but they are meant to be very quick.
I suppose it really comes down to what you want it for, if its to pose about on maybe the Ducati.
wildbeeste said:Nictrix said:I wouldnt choose either of them but if forced I think it would be the S1000rr.
I dont particularly like v-twins and to live with every day I think the Ducati would be a pain.
Small tank means short journeys and having to plan fuel stops every 80 miles.
The BMW however has been reported as not very well built with corrosion setting in on the engine covers early in their life.
Not had a go on one but they are meant to be very quick.
I suppose it really comes down to what you want it for, if its to pose about on maybe the Ducati.
Nictrix is right but you will always regret not having the Duke
![]()
Zed Five said:wildbeeste said:Nictrix said:I wouldnt choose either of them but if forced I think it would be the S1000rr.
I dont particularly like v-twins and to live with every day I think the Ducati would be a pain.
Small tank means short journeys and having to plan fuel stops every 80 miles.
The BMW however has been reported as not very well built with corrosion setting in on the engine covers early in their life.
Not had a go on one but they are meant to be very quick.
I suppose it really comes down to what you want it for, if its to pose about on maybe the Ducati.
Nictrix is right but you will always regret not having the Duke
![]()
Ha! I think that my biggest nagging worry is that if I don't buy the duke I will regret it, but also if I do I'll regret it :lol:
Big Kerhuna said:Both are great bikes. My preference would be the Ducati for the looks, character and exclusivety.
But why not keep your 929 Honda? That's also a great machine and the money needed to change may not be justified. Or even upgrade to a 954. I had one of those before my SP2 and it was also superb.
danmiddle2 said:Neither bikes appeal to me particularly - but I would avoid the Ducati like the plague.
I owned one once... a 3 year old M600 Monster that had <5k miles on it; I bought it used, had it for 18 months... cost me over £3000 in work during that time... covered 56 miles (successfully) from purchase to sale... and was sold as a non-runner. I got very friendly with the local AA guys.
Now I know you'll say I probably had a bad one (let's face, it wasn't a good one) - but it has spoiled Ducati for me forever.
If you are looking for something different dont just limit your choices to BMW or Ducati.Zed Five said:Big Kerhuna said:Both are great bikes. My preference would be the Ducati for the looks, character and exclusivety.
But why not keep your 929 Honda? That's also a great machine and the money needed to change may not be justified. Or even upgrade to a 954. I had one of those before my SP2 and it was also superb.
Thanks, again thinking along my own lines. My 929 only has 12,000m and literally looks new. I still have to add a chunk of money to change, but I never see me using more than one bike. I know that one would sit unused. A low milege 954 is actually a good investment now I think as demand is rising for them, but I want to change as an opportunity for a diferent experience. - thus the bmw, ducati thoughts.
I love the Ducati idea, but when I go on a 200 mile blast on a Sunday morning to Wales, I want to be confident that it will also bring me back :wink: . With a 4 cyl, you just take that for granted. Can a twin really be relied on/reliable?

danmiddle2 said:Neither bikes appeal to me particularly - but I would avoid the Ducati like the plague.
I owned one once... a 3 year old M600 Monster that had <5k miles on it; I bought it used, had it for 18 months... cost me over £3000 in work during that time... covered 56 miles (successfully) from purchase to sale... and was sold as a non-runner. I got very friendly with the local AA guys.
Now I know you'll say I probably had a bad one (let's face, it wasn't a good one) - but it has spoiled Ducati for me forever.
Nictrix said:If you are looking for something different dont just limit your choices to BMW or Ducati.Zed Five said:Big Kerhuna said:Both are great bikes. My preference would be the Ducati for the looks, character and exclusivety.
But why not keep your 929 Honda? That's also a great machine and the money needed to change may not be justified. Or even upgrade to a 954. I had one of those before my SP2 and it was also superb.
Thanks, again thinking along my own lines. My 929 only has 12,000m and literally looks new. I still have to add a chunk of money to change, but I never see me using more than one bike. I know that one would sit unused. A low milege 954 is actually a good investment now I think as demand is rising for them, but I want to change as an opportunity for a diferent experience. - thus the bmw, ducati thoughts.
I love the Ducati idea, but when I go on a 200 mile blast on a Sunday morning to Wales, I want to be confident that it will also bring me back :wink: . With a 4 cyl, you just take that for granted. Can a twin really be relied on/reliable?
I am obviously biased as I have had Yams most of my days but you should maybe consider an R1 as well.
I have had mine for nearly 7 years and my wife has had hers for around 5 years.Not even considering changing them.
I dont know too much about the new crossplane crank R1 other than some people do not get on with them but an older 4C8 or 5VY model is a good safe bet.
![]()