Busterboo said:I wonder why BMW recommends 95 and not 98?
Manufacturers generally recommend a minimum level of fuel quality for satisfactory running, they don’t usually advise owners not to use a better quality fuel :?
Rob
Busterboo said:I wonder why BMW recommends 95 and not 98?
R.E92 said:R60BBA said:Busterboo said:Which, in an M3, you should!![]()
Well, when in Germany I actually get 100 RON V-Power, but in France and Belgium I’ve only seen 98.
But did the same in my 3.0si (and in fact noticed more difference between V-Power and 95/98 on that car more so than my M3. However saying that my M3 has never seen a drop of 95 and won’t during my ownership and so I’ll never really know).![]()
Is your name Rbobba or is the plate hinting towards your occupation as a thief (robber?).

I don't think that's right, Rob.Smartbear said:Busterboo said:I wonder why BMW recommends 95 and not 98?
Manufacturers generally recommend a minimum level of fuel quality for satisfactory running, they don’t usually advise owners not to use a better quality fuel :?
Rob

Busterboo said:I don't think that's right, Rob.Smartbear said:Busterboo said:I wonder why BMW recommends 95 and not 98?
Manufacturers generally recommend a minimum level of fuel quality for satisfactory running, they don’t usually advise owners not to use a better quality fuel :?
Rob
On the label inside the fuel flap it 'says', "ROZ / RON 95" large & bold.
Then, underneath "(ROZ / RON 91-98)" small & plain.
The meaning's clear. 'Use 95, but the car will run on 91-98.'
)
ihadablackdog said:Is there any point putting Tesco Momentum99 in an unmapped 20i?
ihadablackdog said:Is there any point putting Tesco Momentum99 in an unmapped 20i?
Busterboo said:Manual?
So, do you think you might have been causing more over-run when you had the 98 in?enuff_zed said:Yup.Busterboo said:Manual?
Busterboo said:So, do you think you might have been causing more over-run when you had the 98 in?enuff_zed said:Yup.Busterboo said:Manual?
enuff_zed said:Busterboo said:So, do you think you might have been causing more over-run when you had the 98 in?enuff_zed said:Yup.
Well obviously!
I pulled into a service station, filled up with fuel, drove out and thought, I know, I'll drive in a completely different manner to the one I've employed for the previous 400 miles.
Silly me!

Bet you London to a brick lots of folk drive faster with faster fuel. :wink:enuff_zed said:Busterboo said:So, do you think you might have been causing more over-run when you had the 98 in?enuff_zed said:Yup.
Well obviously!
I pulled into a service station, filled up with fuel, drove out and thought, I know, I'll drive in a completely different manner to the one I've employed for the previous 400 miles.
Silly me!
R.E92 said:Tesco Momentum is actually really good fuel. Since I self-tune my car I have it pushed right to the limit of knock on premium fuel so I regularly log the engine knock sensors.
Tesco Momentum is the best, then it's a tossup between Costco Premium and Shell VPower. Costco used to be as good as Tesco but they changed supplier so only have something like 97 or 98 RON fuel now whereas Tesco is at 99.
Costco premium is by far the cheapest, Tesco Momentum tends to be 2 or 3p more and Shell Vpower is usually around 12p more per litre.
enuff_zed said:R.E92 said:Tesco Momentum is actually really good fuel. Since I self-tune my car I have it pushed right to the limit of knock on premium fuel so I regularly log the engine knock sensors.
Tesco Momentum is the best, then it's a tossup between Costco Premium and Shell VPower. Costco used to be as good as Tesco but they changed supplier so only have something like 97 or 98 RON fuel now whereas Tesco is at 99.
Costco premium is by far the cheapest, Tesco Momentum tends to be 2 or 3p more and Shell Vpower is usually around 12p more per litre.
Your findings here though seem to promote the obvious benefits of higher octane rating, which at 99 is obviously going to make Tesco's better. If nothing else, your experimentation has proved that the claim of 99 must be well founded.
However, Shell, for one, extol the virtues of the better cleaning performance of their fuel.
I cannot find any comparison with Momentum for that (and I doubt any of the companies would be willing to publish too much anyway)
So, it is conceivable that you may be better off ceding 1 point of octane rating, in exchange for better cleaning properties.
I feel we will never get to the end of this discussion with a satisfactory conclusion.
Comes down to personal choice to a great degree.
If you're a short term owner, go for the one that gives the best performance (or tuning potential)
If you want to keep the car forever, then maybe go for the best cleaning one.