generaljake said:fyi the rear end of the f-type shows e-type dna
Agreed. I love the E Type but prices are silly now and they are $hite to drive compared with modern cars.
generaljake said:fyi the rear end of the f-type shows e-type dna
original guvnor said:Well I don't know of a 2-seater coupe that outsells its Roadster equivalent though Mowflow. Maybe the price difference will help but I reckon they'll close that price gap over the next few years without admitting they got Roadster pricing wrong!
original guvnor said:Z4M-2006 said:Whats the prices of roadies and coupe?
Entry-level (340PS) car £50k Coupe and £57k Roadster Z4M-2006![]()

mcbeee said:The Cayman is not a coupe version of the Boxster, the fact that the two cars are fe**ing near identical is just a huge coincidence...". 8)



Carol M said:Only thing that spoils the rear of the V6 for me is the centre exhaust. The twin on the bigger engine looks much aesthetically better.
Saying that I don't know what is the difference with having a centre exhaust or a side one (for us lower end zed owners!) you would think a centre one would look more balanced so maybe it's because we're used to not having a centre exhaust on most cars that the F Type looks weird?
Wouldn't say no to one, centre exhaust or not.![]()
GordonM said:generaljake said:fyi the rear end of the f-type shows e-type dna
Agreed. I love the E Type but prices are silly now and they are $hite to drive compared with modern cars.

mad4slalom said:any body else notice a little bit of Chrysler crossfire in the rear view![]()
what are you, blind ? :?generaljake said:mad4slalom said:any body else notice a little bit of Chrysler crossfire in the rear view![]()
nope :roll:
original guvnor said:I quite like it but I don't think it is as uber-gorgeous as some people seem to think it is. It's a bit play-safe in the design stakes if you ask me. It's not an exciting design it's a conservative one. ?