no more 17" mac book pros?? WHYY??

Beedub

Lifer
 Sutton Coldfield
so i saw the updated mac books being shown on the tv... Great i thought, i ordered a top of the 17" pro with upgaded anti glare screen and also larger HD ect ect really a nice unit if not very very expensive..... anyhow i am extatic with this laptop, its my dream unit really, and offers everything i could have ever hoped for anyhow i saw the new unit and decided id buy myself a new one in exact same specs and give mine (only 2 months old) to my mom as a thank you present for all her help recently being an on tap baby sitter, much to my REAL disappointment apple have completely done away with the 17" mac book pro and now the 15" mac book pro is the same price as the run out 17" unit, now being many professionals buy the 17" unit i really dont understand why apple would do this..... but basically im guessing they'd want 3k+ for it hence the reason they dropped it from the lineup..... anyway i purchased the 15" for my mom and unfortunatly wont be purchasing another for myself until they offer this new one in 17" and NOT for stupid money....

cant help but thinking this was a bad move for apple...... needless to say im now very pleased i managed to bag one of the last 17" mbps.....

now iv got to grips with the mac OS, im in love with the way it works.... im hoping they are just trying to find a cheaper way of making retina display in 17".
 
No idea why they have dropped the 17" screen size, but the 15" with retina display looks mind bogglingly awesome, apart from the price that is.

For me if I want to use CAD or similar a 17" screen is pointless, so at work I run 26" illyama monitors with 1900 x 1200 display which are just about perfect, so I can see that if I was going to use a Mac for serious drawing/art work, I wouldn't use an iMac pro (if I could) and hence the real need for a 17" over a 15" isn't there.
 
Because they are big, clumsy, heavy and expensive and the 15" gives more screen real estate given its res with the retina. Had a 17" sold it because i wanted a portable desktop alternative and its just not portable. it's stupidly big got a mac pro and a 13" MacBook pro instead. They work amazing as a pair.
 
tomscott said:
Because they are big, clumsy, heavy and expensive and the 15" gives more screen real estate given its res with the retina. Had a 17" sold it because i wanted a portable desktop alternative and its just not portable. it's stupidly big got a mac pro and a 13" MacBook pro instead. They work amazing as a pair.

From what I was told in the shop it was basically a cost move..... As a business user i think this will cost them ..... Like I say I had the change to swap my 1.5 month old 17" unit for the 15" with retina display and I happily handed the new mac book pro to my mom.

Apple dropped the 17" unit purely because they'd be charging 3.1k plus.....
 
I don't think it's much loss the MacBook Pro ecosystem is complete with the 27" thunderbolt screen, 2" doesn't make much difference at those resolutions especially now with the retina, most pros will use 15s and have a desktop for intensive use.
 
tomscott said:
I don't think it's much loss the MacBook Pro ecosystem is complete with the 27" thunderbolt screen, 2" doesn't make much difference at those resolutions especially now with the retina, most pros will use 15s and have a desktop for intensive use.
That was my take as well and the general opinion on a Mac forum that I frequent.
 
I don't want to carry that seize with me so would not be what I want.

External monitors for the "real" work and the actual smaller laptop display is all I want.
 
pvr said:
I don't want to carry that seize with me so would not be what I want.

External monitors for the "real" work and the actual smaller laptop display is all I want.
My 13" MacBrook Pro is the perfect size for me and if I want a bigger screen I can connect it to my 60 Inch HD TV or use my iMac.
 
Well ye I mean everyone is different, but the 13" is the perfect compromise for me. I do a lot of on location work (photographer) so the 13" is perfect as the screen is big enough to ensure sharpness, it is also very useful for tethering in the studio. It is also a great companion as it is very quick and useful for editing although the screen is a little small but useable. Then I usually combine my lightroom libraries together when I get back to my Mac Pro and use a dual screen set up with 2x 23" cinema displays (The old ones) to edit properly with a before and after preview.

Also use it to show clients work and do a lot of graphic design work on it when im away from my iMac at work so its a proper little work horse.

Even Apple in their advertising advertise pros using the 15" and always have done. The 17" doesn't offer anymore that isn't available in the 15" either so if you wanted a more power for say 3d rendering CAD etc it still doesn't offer any more. Just screen res, but like said with the new resolution there is no need for the 2". But I understand why people want a 17" that was my first machine, and I loved it. Had it with a 23" cinema display but walking to uni with it everyday was a back killer like 4 miles. It was the old style one not a unibody one of the first core 2s. Also with the 17" you cant use regular bags to chuck it in so you had to buy a specific 17" laptop bag and felt a rite wall-e walking around with it. The 13" slips into any standard size bag also reduced the risk of being stolen as laptop bags look like laptop bags. The on location stuff was just a pain too as you dont want much kit with you, studio lights full camera kit, tripods etc last thing I wanted was a large laptop to carry around too. So chopped it in (well gave it to mum) and got a 13".

I would love to swap mine in for a 11" MBA because it offers everything I want as a location machine and its very quick, although the disc space is just too small! Once I have all my software installed thats 50gbs so that takes up half the capacity! My shoots are probably between 1-16gbs depending on what im doing, some weddings up to 25gbs so would be pushing it without an external drive and that IMO defies the point of having a location machine. Also the 3rd party SSD alternatives are so expensive it just doesnt warrant itself. Would constantly be swapping stuff on and off it. So I think the 13" is the best compromise, with mine I have modded it so its running a 128gb SSD and a 750GB drive for storage with 8gbs of ram so works very snappy! Its only a 2.4 too one of the first unibodies. I do also use mine as a personal machine so having the storage is nice, when away with work its nice to have content to keep myself happy while waiting for shoots or on the train etc.

Also Apple have got everyone by the balls now. The new ones have everything integrated and are not user upgradable and got iFixit's lowest repairability score ever with having most of the general upgradable components soldiered straight to the main board. Back in the day you were a bit stupid to max out a mac laptop because the parts are so much more expensive than 3rd parties, like drives and ram. But now you have to pay the apple tax on them, as they are non user upgradable which is a shame. Also the processor upgrades in general terms are expensive unless you are using them for high end graphics or rendering. The base models usually offer the best value-performance per pound, but not now you cant upgrade them you kind of have to max them out for future proofing...
 
Back
Top Bottom