Hunter said:Lol this is my 2nd e89. and 4th z.. the others I swapped out the run flats.... all I’m saying is I have brand new tyres on.. I don’t think the change in ride is worth the expense of abandoning 4 perfectly good tyres for. I won’t be driving it like a race car to need performance grip in the twisties, if I did I’d of got a cayman or a ttrs,,,,I won’t be drag racing it or I’d off kept the TVR... I just want a fast stylish sporting GT that can do most things well. The change in tyres will come, when the rfs are worn. The Z isn’t a car that is exceptional at any one thing, other cars beat it... but what it does is be good at everything were as other cars are more focused in one or two areas and poor in others, the z isn’t poor at anything...I really like the z as it is, I’m in no rush to make changes that cost me unnecessarily.. when the expense becomes unavoidable then the changes will be made.Busterboo said:Hunter said:Like I say, I don’t think the ride is bad, I suppose it’s what you are used to.. my last two cars, 911 c4s 997 and the Tuscan where both much harsher than the z, maybe if I had come from a c class I would think differently but for now the z is spot on.
It's not a matter of harshness, but of performance.
Search the forum and you'll find a large number of posts on the topic. Many say the same thing: you'll never know how good the Z4 is until you dump the runflats.
So, actually, you know more about Zs than most of us.