z4pilot said:1000rr said:z4pilot said:It doesn't work though. Didn't work in the 70's when we interned suspected IRA members without trial and it hasn't worked in Guantanamo. All you do is take a few suspected high risk individuals off the street and inspire more to join the cause.
Better off the streets and not interacting through communications via internet etc, than on the streets.
It's just a (very) short term respite though - I'm no bleeding heart liberal, but I can't think of one example where forced internment has killed off an idea or an ideology. How many Palestinians do you think the Israelis have banged up at the moment? I've not a clue, but it hasn't stopped any of the problems over there has it? We need to come up with better ideas than those that will just reinforce prejudices and entrench attitudes and behaviours....
1000rr said:z4pilot said:1000rr said:Better off the streets and not interacting through communications via internet etc, than on the streets.
It's just a (very) short term respite though - I'm no bleeding heart liberal, but I can't think of one example where forced internment has killed off an idea or an ideology. How many Palestinians do you think the Israelis have banged up at the moment? I've not a clue, but it hasn't stopped any of the problems over there has it? We need to come up with better ideas than those that will just reinforce prejudices and entrench attitudes and behaviours....
It's all about the pounds, shilling and pence. There will never be peace on earth. Still starving people, water shortages and disease. If we all clubbed together there would be no famine etc...
Presidents and Prime Ministers don't run countries.....banks, corporations and powerful families do.
1000rr said:It will carry on unless the powers that be come down HARD on them... I like a quiet life like the rest of us, but the liberals and do gooders get right on my tits. To easy to shout "racist" and imo, the most ignorant, uneducated reply, ever.
Ducklakeview said:Wow, quite a can of worms I've opened!!
To echo the above, imo we need HARD and definite action NOW. We cannot, as a nation sit back and allow this to continue.
Personally, as I've said - IF someone is on a watch list, they surely have to be considered a threat to the nation, so by all accounts removing those people will make the nation a safer place..
(Ducklakeview now ducking for cover...)
Mike
dans6490 said:The people who follow this ideology are somehow allowed to preach on the streets of the UK, they are allowed to have protest marches in towns and cities WITH police protection.
Saudi based 'wahabi' clerics are allowed to preach freely in our universities and schools.
Allowing people to preach, against our values, our way of life and our beliefs in our own country is quite frankly ridiculous.
The do-gooders, race card waivers and tree huggers have everyone too scared to speak up but the reality is that most people were fed up/angry/astonished at this situation years ago but were either too afraid to speak up or not listened to.
The minority that follow this ideology need special laws, rules and treatment.
We've tried softly softly but IMO, these creatures have ran out of chances.
Lee Rigby should have been the wake up call but sadly, too many people thought that hoping it would all go away was enough.
There were certainly celebrations in Nelson that day contrary to libtard claims from benv6 etc that there weren't. I fkn saw them with my own eyes, i drove right through their impromptu streetparties! The fkrs.Sky-drive said:Im pretty sure there were reports on the day of 9/11 that there were employees at a well known South Gloucestershire based aircraft engineering firm who witnessed a large number of apprentice students of middle eastern and Arabic persuasion in the workshops celebrating the terrorist attack ...
Seems its okay for people, the politicians and the media to state 'enough is enough' but then everyone puts their head in the sand, crosses their fingers and waits for the issue to pass them by in the hope any future UK terrorist atrocity wont ever impact personally on them or their family.
Why is it no one really has the balls to stand up and take a pragmatic approach: if you are known to the UK security services for anti Western extremist views and refuse to take an oath of allegiance to the UK (nor prepared to recant your belief in ISIS/Taliban/Al-Qaeda etc), then you automatically secure a one way cruise ticket on an oil tanker bound westward towards the setting sun and can be dropped off anywhere over the Mid Atlantic Ridge when the tanks require washing out. Job done.
Chris_D said:libtard
Sky-drive said:Im pretty sure there were reports on the day of 9/11 that there were employees at a well known South Gloucestershire based aircraft engineering firm who witnessed a large number of apprentice students of middle eastern and Arabic persuasion in the workshops celebrating the terrorist attack ...
Seems its okay for people, the politicians and the media to state 'enough is enough' but then everyone puts their head in the sand, crosses their fingers and waits for the issue to pass them by in the hope any future UK terrorist atrocity wont ever impact personally on them or their family.
Why is it no one really has the balls to stand up and take a pragmatic approach: if you are known to the UK security services for anti Western extremist views and refuse to take an oath of allegiance to the UK (nor prepared to recant your belief in ISIS/Taliban/Al-Qaeda etc), then you automatically secure a one way cruise ticket on an oil tanker bound westward towards the setting sun and can be dropped off anywhere over the Mid Atlantic Ridge when the tanks require washing out. Job done.
z4pilot said:Sky-drive said:Im pretty sure there were reports on the day of 9/11 that there were employees at a well known South Gloucestershire based aircraft engineering firm who witnessed a large number of apprentice students of middle eastern and Arabic persuasion in the workshops celebrating the terrorist attack ...
Seems its okay for people, the politicians and the media to state 'enough is enough' but then everyone puts their head in the sand, crosses their fingers and waits for the issue to pass them by in the hope any future UK terrorist atrocity wont ever impact personally on them or their family.
Why is it no one really has the balls to stand up and take a pragmatic approach: if you are known to the UK security services for anti Western extremist views and refuse to take an oath of allegiance to the UK (nor prepared to recant your belief in ISIS/Taliban/Al-Qaeda etc), then you automatically secure a one way cruise ticket on an oil tanker bound westward towards the setting sun and can be dropped off anywhere over the Mid Atlantic Ridge when the tanks require washing out. Job done.
Ok, so I'm playing devils advocate here....
Including the Westminster attack in March, 35 people have been killed in an appallingly violent manner by sick twisted individuals and the majority of the posters on this thread seem to be quite happy to demonise a section of society, remove their civil liberties, throw away the key etc etc.
In the same period, (10 weeks and 5 days) up to 375 people have been killed in road accidents (source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/580347/Road-deaths-UK-research) and there are lots of people who would quite happily see this communities' civil liberties severely curtailed to reduce that number - and we would argue against it.
Things have to change, that much is clear, but you can bet the right answer won't be the simplistic one.
z4pilot said:Sky-drive said:Im pretty sure there were reports on the day of 9/11 that there were employees at a well known South Gloucestershire based aircraft engineering firm who witnessed a large number of apprentice students of middle eastern and Arabic persuasion in the workshops celebrating the terrorist attack ...
Seems its okay for people, the politicians and the media to state 'enough is enough' but then everyone puts their head in the sand, crosses their fingers and waits for the issue to pass them by in the hope any future UK terrorist atrocity wont ever impact personally on them or their family.
Why is it no one really has the balls to stand up and take a pragmatic approach: if you are known to the UK security services for anti Western extremist views and refuse to take an oath of allegiance to the UK (nor prepared to recant your belief in ISIS/Taliban/Al-Qaeda etc), then you automatically secure a one way cruise ticket on an oil tanker bound westward towards the setting sun and can be dropped off anywhere over the Mid Atlantic Ridge when the tanks require washing out. Job done.
Ok, so I'm playing devils advocate here....
Including the Westminster attack in March, 35 people have been killed in an appallingly violent manner by sick twisted individuals and the majority of the posters on this thread seem to be quite happy to demonise a section of society, remove their civil liberties, throw away the key etc etc.
In the same period, (10 weeks and 5 days) up to 375 people have been killed in road accidents (source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/580347/Road-deaths-UK-research) and there are lots of people who would quite happily see this communities' civil liberties severely curtailed to reduce that number - and we would argue against it.
Things have to change, that much is clear, but you can bet the right answer won't be the simplistic one.
benv6 said:ranski said:While browsing through the forum I see pictures of everyone's shinny cars on their nice, well kept drives and think to myself, if i parachuted you and your family into Birmingham's Sparkhill or some similar London East End suburb, after a month, or even a few days would you still disagree there are people or whole communities who don't wish to integrate, and actually prefer the division? Or are they simply being left behind in terms of wealth and social standing?
Just curious.
Very Interesting ! Unfortunately there is no simple answer, a book can be written not to answer you but just to give you an opinion.
Your question is simple grammatically but very complex socially, I guess my short answer would be that we are still evolving as "Intelligent" creatures !!! And we still have a long way to go !!
Sky-drive said:z4pilot said:Sky-drive said:Im pretty sure there were reports on the day of 9/11 that there were employees at a well known South Gloucestershire based aircraft engineering firm who witnessed a large number of apprentice students of middle eastern and Arabic persuasion in the workshops celebrating the terrorist attack ...
Seems its okay for people, the politicians and the media to state 'enough is enough' but then everyone puts their head in the sand, crosses their fingers and waits for the issue to pass them by in the hope any future UK terrorist atrocity wont ever impact personally on them or their family.
Why is it no one really has the balls to stand up and take a pragmatic approach: if you are known to the UK security services for anti Western extremist views and refuse to take an oath of allegiance to the UK (nor prepared to recant your belief in ISIS/Taliban/Al-Qaeda etc), then you automatically secure a one way cruise ticket on an oil tanker bound westward towards the setting sun and can be dropped off anywhere over the Mid Atlantic Ridge when the tanks require washing out. Job done.
Ok, so I'm playing devils advocate here....
Including the Westminster attack in March, 35 people have been killed in an appallingly violent manner by sick twisted individuals and the majority of the posters on this thread seem to be quite happy to demonise a section of society, remove their civil liberties, throw away the key etc etc.
In the same period, (10 weeks and 5 days) up to 375 people have been killed in road accidents (source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/580347/Road-deaths-UK-research) and there are lots of people who would quite happily see this communities' civil liberties severely curtailed to reduce that number - and we would argue against it.
Things have to change, that much is clear, but you can bet the right answer won't be the simplistic one.
And of those 375 people killed in road traffic accidents how many met their demise as a result of a motorist waking up one morning and deciding todays the day they are going to head out in their car and bring death to British streets??? Comparing road deaths with deaths caused by terrorist atrocities doesn't really stack up ... its like trying to compare cheese and chocolate because they both contain milk!!
If an extremist is threatening to end my (or a member of my family) way of life through violent acts or the publicly encouraging of others to commit violence then I couldn't give two figs about their civil liberties ... they surrendered those the minute they succumbed to extremist ideology.
z4pilot said:Sky-drive said:z4pilot said:Ok, so I'm playing devils advocate here....
Including the Westminster attack in March, 35 people have been killed in an appallingly violent manner by sick twisted individuals and the majority of the posters on this thread seem to be quite happy to demonise a section of society, remove their civil liberties, throw away the key etc etc.
In the same period, (10 weeks and 5 days) up to 375 people have been killed in road accidents (source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/580347/Road-deaths-UK-research) and there are lots of people who would quite happily see this communities' civil liberties severely curtailed to reduce that number - and we would argue against it.
Things have to change, that much is clear, but you can bet the right answer won't be the simplistic one.
And of those 375 people killed in road traffic accidents how many met their demise as a result of a motorist waking up one morning and deciding todays the day they are going to head out in their car and bring death to British streets??? Comparing road deaths with deaths caused by terrorist atrocities doesn't really stack up ... its like trying to compare cheese and chocolate because they both contain milk!!
If an extremist is threatening to end my (or a member of my family) way of life through violent acts or the publicly encouraging of others to commit violence then I couldn't give two figs about their civil liberties ... they surrendered those the minute they succumbed to extremist ideology.
You're missing the point I was trying to make... To begin with, I said I was playing devils advocate - so I'm taking a position with a view to stimulating debate.
I'm not trying to equate deaths due to road accidents with deaths due to terrorism - although all unnecessary deaths are shocking tragedies that can only bring untold misery to family and friends.
My point was more one of communities.
35 people die in terrorist attacks and because those deaths are perpetrated by people from a specific community that most of the contributors to this thread do not belong to, it results in knee jerk thinking and gung ho solutions.
375 people die as a result of something that as car enthusiasts we are much closer to, and have a more nuanced understanding of, and we don't see members on here calling for mass bannings or swingeing restrictions on car drivers do we?
Outside of the car enthusiast community though, you do see calls for tougher penalties, cars referred to as killing machines etc etc, because people will take a simplistic view of situations they don't fully understand.
It's a question of perspective, and I'm simply offering a view that the answer to resolving the problems we face with Islamic terrorism is more complex than the hang 'em high view that some are putting forward.