Mercedes-Benz SLK -v- BMW Z4 (All Variants)

Z

Z4MAD

Member
Site Supporter
Dear Comrades,

Recently, whilst drawn to a halt in what had been extremely slow moving traffic, I noted in the opposing carriageway an Mercedes-Benz SLK and thought how nice it looked; the design and overall size is not dissimilar to that of the BMW Z4. And yet, whilst I appreciate the design of the SLK and actually quite like it, I could never own one. I ruminated upon why this should be so but was not able to form a complete conclusion.

And yes, I accept that many denigrate the SLK by stating that it is an 'Hairdressers Car' but when observing it from a detached and quite dispassionate perspective, I really cannot understand why this should be the perception. And yet, I would not wish to be seen in one let alone own one. I realise this is wholly irrational and is certainly totally illogical and find it quite odd that a pragmatic person such as myself should think in this way let alone form a negative opinion of something that is really very nice. All quite bizarre.

Does anyone have an opinion on this matter?

With kind regards,

MAD
 
Dear Comrade MAD,

That is quite a conundrum.

As a dedicated E86 owner I never considered an SLK, but I recently read a book of Clarkson's musings from the Sunday Times of that era, and he was less than complimentary about the 7-speed Auto in the SLK 350. He said it was indecisive about which gear to use at any one time, to the extent he would prefer a manual gearbox despite MB's manual efforts not being highly revered.

Then after driving a manual 35i Z4 he decided it was the best 2 seat option, until 2 or 3 weeks later he proclaimed that an MX5 was an even better 2 seater!

So at the end of the day personal preferences probably influence choices.
 
Mr Tidy said:
Dear Comrade MAD,

That is quite a conundrum.

As a dedicated E86 owner I never considered an SLK, but I recently read a book of Clarkson's musings from the Sunday Times of that era, and he was less than complimentary about the 7-speed Auto in the SLK 350. He said it was indecisive about which gear to use at any one time, to the extent he would prefer a manual gearbox despite MB's manual efforts not being highly revered.

Then after driving a manual 35i Z4 he decided it was the best 2 seat option, until 2 or 3 weeks later he proclaimed that an MX5 was an even better 2 seater!

So at the end of the day personal preferences probably influence choices.
Click to expand...
Wow :o :? Clarkson got something right. :D :wink:
 
I looked around one in a dealers, diesel version, i quite liked it. Wasn't that keen on the interior, bit bland, black in and out. The mpg was about half as much again compared to Z4 with same HP. With roof down the gaps around the boot area seemed bigger. Was going new for about £26k.
Customer has similar older car seems to go alright when given lift home as passenger.
 
I had an R171 version 3.0 and it was actually an ok car as a cruiser, mpg was not great but it was actually the car I kept the longest at 2 years, even longer than my Elise (what was I thinking)

I looked at an R172 when it was first launched and thought it looked great, now the interior looks very dated and the exterior has not exactly aged well either.

I cant see me buying one when I change the zed - will be another zed or an F type
 
Everyday driver did a comparison of these 2 models:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuP_D3XyyIE&t=509s

Edit: just realised this is in the E89 section. still an interesting watch though.
 
For me it is quite simple. The Merc is just a bit too angular.
The curves don't flow in my view.
 
I had an R172 SLC as a loaner when my SL was in for some warranty work and it was atrocious, noisy and uncomfortable, though in its defence I was stepping from the quiet comfort of the SL :lol:

I did look at the 250 diesel as a replacement for the e89 and was impressed enough at the time, but opted for the E350 as it was a bit more practical
 
I would consider one of the early SLK55s but probably nothing else, they're a lot of car for the money but no more so than a Z4MR :thumbsup:
 
Really not a fan of the slk the sl on the other hand looks a lot more car, almost certainly will be the next 2 seater i buy.. not as nice looking as the zed in all honesty but I like the idea of a big comfy 2 seater wafter with a V engine :D
 
mr.tourette said:
Really not a fan of the slk the sl on the other hand looks a lot more car, almost certainly will be the next 2 seater i buy.. not as nice looking as the zed in all honesty but I like the idea of a big comfy 2 seater wafter with a V engine :D
Click to expand...

I had a play with an SL coming through Glen Shee last week. Definitely didn’t sit as well as the Zed. Didn’t get too long to study it as he indicated to let me past once we started pushing on a bit :oops:
 
Argyll Andy said:
mr.tourette said:
Really not a fan of the slk the sl on the other hand looks a lot more car, almost certainly will be the next 2 seater i buy.. not as nice looking as the zed in all honesty but I like the idea of a big comfy 2 seater wafter with a V engine :D
Click to expand...

I had a play with an SL coming through Glen Shee last week. Definitely didn’t sit as well as the Zed. Didn’t get too long to study it as he indicated to let me past once we started pushing on a bit :oops:
Click to expand...

Yeah I wouldn't expect it to handle as well as the zed does, its definitely a fast wafter rather than a scratcher, would suit me though right enough for my use
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom