Low mileage or more options.

Hark

Active member
Looking at a Z4M roadster and I reckon I've got about £19k to spend.

Seems that I can get a low mileage one (20k ish) but with basic options or something with 35-40k miles but with lots more toys. Nav/speaker upgrades etc

Has anyone put any decent miles on one of these yet and noticed when things like sensors/clutch etc start to go. M

Which would you go for? Same year of manufacture.
 
Nav is a "must have" on the coupes. It is not so much of a necessity on the Roadsters.

The opposite applies to heated seats, not a must on the coupe but if you want the roof down 3 (or even 4 lol) seasons per year on the roadster...I would never buy a roadster without them. Very difficult to retrofit.

The standard stereo is absolute pants on either model.

Wind deflectors, bluetooth and cruise control are relatively easy to sort out if the car you buy doesn't have them.

These cars do not resell very well once mileage gets above 45-50k, because there are just so many low mileage examples. You will find a proportion of cars are kept as 'second cars' more so the roadsters.

I wouldn't go for an absolute basic specification but something with a couple of options. It will come down to the difference between a car with Nav or without Nav, as that makes the biggest difference to prices from what I can tell. The screen is very difficult to see on a sunny day with the roof down anyway, plus in my case I already had a top of the range TomTom which has a lot more functionality than the BMW Nav.

Personally I would (and did choose) no Nav but lower miles; when purchasing cars I consider mileage, condition and an enthusiast owner over spec. This last point is the key advantage of buying privately (or the key risk buying from a dealer).

The pre and post cat lambda sensors on the M tend to need replacing in the first two or three years, not on all cars but seems a common fault, less so on cars not used year round or in the rain because one of the contributing factors seems to be road crap thrown up onto the sensor. Cost about £250-300 out of warranty. People that have had their sensors changed don't seem to have experienced a problem since.

It's the same engine as the M3, well proven, some initial bearing shell issues in 2001-2 were ironed out long before the Z4M was produced. I have not known anyone to have a clutch changed on this forum as yet, and I never recall seeing an M3 for sale with 'recent clutch change' in the advert. I surmise that they last a long time compared to some other performance cars (STI for example).
 
texasjohn said:
Nav is a "must have" on the coupes. It is not so much of a necessity on the Roadsters.

The opposite applies to heated seats, not a must on the coupe but if you want the roof down 3 (or even 4 lol) seasons per year on the roadster...I would never buy a roadster without them. Very difficult to retrofit.

The standard stereo is absolute pants on either model.

Cheers for the advice.

Why is the roadster nav not important, because of the sun or ...?
I'm looking at ones with upgraded stereos as this is important for me.

Wind deflectors, bluetooth and cruise control are relatively easy to sort out if the car you buy doesn't have them.

Good to know cruise is an easy retrofit. Did this on the TT and wouldn't want to be without it.
 
The effect of the sub reflecting with the roof down affects any Nav unit to be fair although you can reposition the TomTom to reduce this problem.

The roadster is more likely to be bought as a weekend / sports car so no real need for Nav compared to a primary or 'daily' car. Coupes without Nav seem to take longer to sell or are more of an issue to sell than Roadsters without it, from what I have heard / seen.
 
Back
Top Bottom