ronk said:When it happens we know that it's not not our "skill" that avoids any collision, just good look!
Good look? What is Perry's excuse then?
:evil:ronk said:When it happens we know that it's not not our "skill" that avoids any collision, just good look!
:evil:Perhaps any crash damage would only improve them :lol:pvr said:Good look? What is Perry's excuse then?ronk said:When it happens we know that it's not not our "skill" that avoids any collision, just good look!:evil:
ronk said:Out of curiosity, how would a LSD help? :?
Without knowing the cause for sure, I can't be certain but I don't believe that it would have - hence my earlier comment.ronk said:I know how a diff works and accept that as soon as one wheel lifts , then effectively there is then no further motive force - hence no more loss of traction on the non spinning wheel. (Or the other one)
However with a LSD there is available traction to the other wheel and therefore the more likely that it would also break traction .
That's why I'm confused as to why it would help in a whoops moment like this?
Without an LSD when one wheel slips you lose drive. This causes deceleration and a weight transfer from rear to front. Rear goes light, lateral grip reduces and the tail slide ensues (the same as lift off oversteer). The LSD keeps the traction and forward motive force so no rear to front weight transfer so no onset of slide, or at least any slide is minimised.ronk said:I know how a diff works and accept that as soon as one wheel lifts , then effectively there is then no further motive force - hence no more loss of traction on the non spinning wheel. (Or the other one)
However with a LSD there is available traction to the other wheel and therefore the more likely that it would also break traction .
That's why I'm confused as to why it would help in a whoops moment like this?
None really, except it's more difficult to become a drift champion!ronk said:Now the £100,000 question, What are the down sides of a LSD?